This is probably the most useless piece of information, but I accidentally discovered that the hours (h) and seconds (s) masks work in ColdFusion's DateFormat() method. Yesterday, I was trying to format a time stamp but absent mindedly used the DateFormat() instead of the TimeFormat() method. To my surprise, it actually worked (at least partially). Running this code several times:
- #DateFormat( Now(), "hh ss" )#
... gives me:
I am running this a 8:07 AM and as you can see, even though we are using ColdFusion's DateFormat() method, the hours comes out correctly (8) and the seconds are incrementing as refresh the page.
This is very strange to me. Applying a mask must take processing time. I wonder why ColdFusion would take the effort to apply any masks that were not supposed to be used in the DateFormat() function.
Looking For A New Job?
- ColdFusion Engineer at HotelPlanner
- ColdFusion Cloud Software Developer - SaaS Application at Retensa
This is definitely not covered in the docs. The only changes I see is that in MX they added full, long, medium, and short aliases.
It's probably just a side-effect of the underlying algorithm. I can't imagine that this is useful in any way. Minutes don't work because the (m) maps to months in DateFormat(). And, TT for AM/PM doesn't do anything - it just comes back as TT in the resultant formatted string. If TT worked, I could maybe imagine using hTT as part of a DateFormat() call... but, oh well.
It does seem like it would make more sense to just combine the two into DateTimeFormat() I get so annoyed with this line of code:
#DateFormat(now(), "m/dd/yyyy)# #TimeFormat(now(), "hh:mm:ss tt")#
Exactly. I am sure Ray will tell you that that UDF is up on CFLib.org. I also wrote one a while back as well:
A group of jellyfish is called a "smack"
That is a more useless piece of information.
Ha ha. Now would that be a "smack of jellyfish" or is that redundant?
So if you do a belly flop into a pool of jellyfish, does that mean you just belly smacked and smacked a smack?
Can you be more spineless than a smack?
I noticed this while working on performance optimization but I did not change it because it didn't hurt and more importantly, wanted to avoid any risk of breaking existing app even though it is undocumented. Sometimes backward compatibility makes you do strange things :-)
Yeah, very true. Especially since it's not hurting anyone, just leave it alone. However, if there was a subset of TimeMasks that were documented to work in DateFormat(), I bet that would make a TON of people happy :)
n = minutes in Dateformat()
All valid datepart masks:
yyyy - Year
q - Quarter
m - Month
d - Day
w - Weekday
ww - Week
h - Hour
n - Minute
s - Second
I think you all need smacked :D