ColdFusion Application.cfc OnRequest() Creates A Component Mixin

Posted July 2, 2007 at 8:30 AM

Tags: ColdFusion

A lot of people have trouble wrapping their heads around the OnRequest() event method of the ColdFusion Application.cfc component. I have to admit, at first, you just accept that it works, but you don't quite understand the magic that's behind it. The truth is, the OnRequest() event method really treats the target template as a component mixin. Understanding this will really help you to see what data the requested page has access to and in what context the page is actually executing.

Let's take a look at a standard OnRequest() Application.cfc event:

 Launch code in new window » Download code as text file »

  • <cffunction
  • name="OnRequest"
  • access="public"
  • returntype="boolean"
  • output="true"
  • hint="Executes the requested ColdFusion template.">
  •  
  • <!--- Define arguments. --->
  • <cfargument
  • name="TargetPage"
  • type="string"
  • required="true"
  • hint="The requested ColdFusion template."
  • />
  •  
  • <!--- Include the requested ColdFusion template. --->
  • <cfinclude template="#ARGUMENTS.TargetPage#" />
  •  
  • <!--- Return out. --->
  • <cfreturn true />
  • </cffunction>

And, let's assume that the target page being passed into the OnRequest() event method is this HTML page:

 Launch code in new window » Download code as text file »

  • <html>
  • <head>
  • <title>OnRequest() Mixin</title>
  • </head>
  • <body>
  •  
  • <p>
  • This is the target page. Sweet!
  • </p>
  •  
  • </body>
  • </html>

In this event code, the user-requested page is passed in as the only argument. We then, turn around and CFInclude that target page for execution (the mixin aspect). People get so caught up on the whole newness of the Application.cfc that they forget what CFInclude does: it includes the target template into the current page of execution.

Understanding that, we can actually get rid of the CFInclude totally and rewrite the above OnRequest() event method to look like this:

 Launch code in new window » Download code as text file »

  • <cffunction
  • name="OnRequest"
  • access="public"
  • returntype="boolean"
  • output="true"
  • hint="Executes the requested ColdFusion template.">
  •  
  • <!--- Define arguments. --->
  • <cfargument
  • name="TargetPage"
  • type="string"
  • required="true"
  • hint="The requested ColdFusion template."
  • />
  •  
  • <!--- Include the requested ColdFusion template. --->
  • <!---
  • <cfinclude template="#ARGUMENTS.TargetPage#" />
  • --->
  •  
  • <!---
  • Instead of CFIncluding the target template,
  • let's just rewrite the event method to actually
  • contain the target template code. This
  • accomplishes the exact same thing. We are just
  • skipping the middle man.
  • --->
  • <html>
  • <head>
  • <title>OnRequest() Mixin</title>
  • </head>
  • <body>
  •  
  • <p>
  • This is the target page. Sweet!
  • </p>
  •  
  • </body>
  • </html>
  •  
  • <!--- Return out. --->
  • <cfreturn true />
  • </cffunction>

Once you see the OnRequest() application event written in this manner, it becomes much easier to understand the context in which the page is executing. The target page is really PART OF the Application.cfc, and more specifically, it is actually PART OF the OnRequest() event code. Therefore, it has access to all local variables of the OnRequest() event method as well as all public and private variables of the Application.cfc's THIS and VARIABLES scope.

Now that we are beginning to bridge this mental gap, it becomes more clear why Application.cfc-scoped methods are available to OnRequest() included pages and why something like this:

 Launch code in new window » Download code as text file »

  • <html>
  • <head>
  • <title>OnRequest() Mixin</title>
  • </head>
  • <body>
  •  
  • <p>
  • This is the target page. Sweet!
  • </p>
  •  
  • <!---
  • Output the page passed to the OnRequest()
  • event method.
  • --->
  • <p>
  • <cfoutput>
  • TargetPage: #ARGUMENTS.TargetPage#
  • </cfoutput>
  • </p>
  •  
  • </body>
  • </html>

... will not bomb out, but will in fact output the template path passed to the OnRequest() event method.

Understanding the concept of the Mixin really helped me get my head fully wrapped around the concept of the OnRequest() event method. I hope that this has cleared a few things up for you.

Download Code Snippet ZIP File

Post Comment  |  Ask Ben  |  Permalink  |  Other Searches  |  Print Page




Learning ColdFusion 9 - ColdFusion 9 tutorials, samples, examples, demos

Reader Comments

Aug 19, 2009 at 10:56 PM // reply »
7 Comments

typo detected...
"Executes the requested ColdFusoin template"


Aug 20, 2009 at 7:48 AM // reply »
6,516 Comments

@Mike,

Thanks, fixed.


Sep 21, 2009 at 10:43 AM // reply »
26 Comments

Also cool is the ability to use CFM pages as modules, instead of includes.

<cfinclude template="#arguments.targetPage#"/>

<cfmodule template="#arguments.targetPage#"/>

You can then do some fancy stuff, like pass attributes.

<!--- <cfset uri="/blog/805-ColdFusion-Application-cfc-OnRequest-Creates-A-Component-Mixin.htm"/> --->
<cfset article=reReplace(uri, "^/blog/(\d+)-.+.htm$", "\1", "all")/>
<cfmodule template="#arguments.targetPage#" article="#article#"/>


Sep 21, 2009 at 10:53 AM // reply »
6,516 Comments

@Alex,

True, but in that you are no longer creating a Mixin (which is really what this post was about). Since custom tags exist in their own memory space, you will need to explicitly use the CALLER scope to reach back up into the Application.cfc.

Custom tags are definitely cool; but, you really have to pick one or the other as they have extremely different behaviors - you can't just swap between the two.


Sep 25, 2009 at 2:53 PM // reply »
26 Comments

You can also is Ben's technique to do page-specific mixins.

Separate your business logic from display logic!

This is similar to code behind files in ASP.NET. (Although ASP.NET provides late bind and other stuff.)

Keep in mind this is simplified to demonstrate. This just does pre-processing. Theoretically, you could also perform post-processing, late bind, et al cool tricks.

application.cfc
<cfcomponent output="false">
<cffunction name="onRequest"><
cfset var temp={}/><
cfsilent>
<cfif (fileExists(expandPath(reReplace(arguments[1], "\.cfm$", ".cfc", "all"))))>
<cfset data=createObject("component", arrayToList(listToArray(reReplace(arguments[1], "\.cfm$", "", "all"), "/"), ".")).init()/>
</cfif>
<cfsavecontent variable="temp.body"><cfinclude template="#arguments[1]#"/></cfsavecontent>
<cfset temp.body=trim(temp.body)/>
</cfsilent
><cfoutput>#toString(temp.body)#</cfoutput><
/cffunction>
</cfcomponent>

samplepage.cfc
<cfcomponent output="false">
<cffunction name="init" output="false">
<cfset var temp={}/>
<cfset temp.data="foo"/>
<cfreturn temp.data/>
</cffunction>
</cfcomponent>

samplepage.cfm
<div>data: <cfdump var="#data#"/></div>

@Ben, I guess I need my own blog, so I stop mucking up yours. :) -AH


Sep 29, 2009 at 9:27 AM // reply »
6,516 Comments

@Alex,

That's definitely a very interesting idea.

No worries about posting here - it's all good conversation!


Post Comment  |  Ask Ben

Recent Blog Comments
Nov 21, 2009 at 4:49 PM
Styling The ColdFusion 8 WriteToBrowser CFImage Output
Great work yet again Ben! Whilst I didn't use this whole code, I copied some of your regex code for a similar problem with the lack of an alt attribute and unescaped ampersands in CFIMAGE for Railo 3 ... read »
Nov 21, 2009 at 1:13 PM
My First ColdFusion Builder Extension - Encrypting And Decrypting CFM / CFC Files
@Ben, Because I am pedantic, I just want to make sure that everyone knows there is absolutely no encryption going on. There is only encoding and obfuscation. The cfencode tool only obfuscates your C ... read »
Nov 21, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Using ColdFusion Structures To Remove Duplicate List Values
@Jody I can't seem to get your code sample to work. If you are still having problems, try this code out and see if it gets you what you wanted. <!--- Comma delimited list with various duplicates ... read »
Nov 21, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Groovy Operator Overloading Does Not Work In The ColdFusion Context
Hi Ben, Thanks for this informative post. Now I am reading ur old posts too ... read »
Nov 21, 2009 at 10:56 AM
HostMySite.com Has The Best ColdFusion Hosting
@Mehul, Yes very nice people, however several downtimes per day which was not acceptable. Hence we had to move out. I am glad you are having good luck with them so far. ... read »
Nov 20, 2009 at 11:32 PM
Five Months Without Hungarian Notation And I'm Loving It
I've used headless camel case for years for not only ColdFusion variables, but also SQL tables and fields... pretty much everything involving code. I also subscribe to the "don't abbreviate and clea ... read »
Nov 20, 2009 at 11:00 PM
Five Months Without Hungarian Notation And I'm Loving It
@Marcel, Yeah, I always err on the side of longer but more readable variable names. As for the camel casing of CF methods and the headless camel casing of custom items, I get around this by always ... read »