Why Do I Even Get Any Huge Ass Traffic?

Posted June 26, 2007 at 8:42 AM by Ben Nadel

Tags: Search Engine Optimization

There was a post yesterday on Full As A Goog (sorry I cannot remember the URL - the Full As A Goog "Search" functionality seems to search the visible page only) with a video that had information about internet porn. It stated that there were literally hundred of millions of porn sites current on the internet. That's a lot of porn.

Recently, I talked about how the second most popular incoming search phrase for my site, Kinky Solutions, from Google was "Huge Ass." At first, I was just amused that my site came up with Huge Ass right along side real porn sites like "Ass Traffic", "Big Tits, Round Asses," and "Big Booty Sites Galore." But, now, after having pondered it for a while I am just confused. With hundreds of millions of porn sites, why does my site have any visibility on Google when it comes to "Huge Ass?" In fact, why are 8 out of the top 10 results NOT porn sites? What the heck is going on here?

There can only be two reasons for this poor visibibiliy:

  1. Google simply won't index porn sites.
  2. Porn sites have just about the most horrible search engine optimization you can ever imagine.

Number 1 clearly is not true, as the top 2 Google results for "Huge Ass" are, in fact, genuine porn sites. Therefore, I must jump to the conclusion that porn sites have the worst search engine optimization in history. I guess it's like the age old mentality that you don't have to sell drugs - drugs sell themselves. Except in this case, it's porn - you don't have to make the quality web sites that showcase it, cause the porn itself is enough???? Or something like that... I mean, what else could it possibly be?

And yes, my "Safe Search" is turned off for all Google searches.

Maybe the fault is not that of the porn site web masters, but rather that of porn itself. If content plays very heavily into the Google search rankings, my guess is that porn sites simply cannot contain enough "valid" content as a consequence of the fact that their main products are pictures and videos, not indexable text. But, there's got to be a way to marry these two ideas together. There's just too much money at stake for this not to be happening - or maybe that's also part of the problem - there's so much money being made already that no one really cares of these sorts of details.

Food for thought indeed!



Reader Comments

Jun 26, 2007 at 8:56 AM // reply »
1 Comments

My guess is: most shady porn sites are banned on google because they "search engine optimized" just a little bit too much.


Jun 26, 2007 at 9:02 AM // reply »
21 Comments

I believe that this is the link you're looking for:
http://www.bloginblack.de/archives/000871.cfm


Jun 26, 2007 at 9:04 AM // reply »
10,638 Comments

@Danilo,

Yeah, thanks that's the one. I was trying to Google for it, but couldn't find it.


Jun 26, 2007 at 9:07 AM // reply »
34 Comments

Reminds me of my friends experience recently. She gets crazy search traffic for punky brewster naked... read her funny account here.

http://www.redwhiteandesoteric.com/index.cfm


Jun 26, 2007 at 9:40 AM // reply »
6 Comments

You think that's bad? Apparently 85% of my traffic now comes from people googling for "donkey sex".

I don't know what's worse - the fact that over three times as many people come from googling for "donkey sex" as the second-placed term ("svn+ssh"), or that people who find a site called Instant Badger from googling for "donkey sex" actually stick around for more than one page!

I can just picture it - "where's my donkey sex, dammit? (clickety) I want my donkey sex!!! (clickety)"


Jun 26, 2007 at 9:57 AM // reply »
92 Comments

With blog titles like "Project HUGE: My Ass Hurts" do I really need to paint the picture for you? It shouldn't surprise that you are getting that kind of traffic with the type of content you have here. :)


Jun 26, 2007 at 10:16 AM // reply »
33 Comments

LOOOOOOOOOOOL That last comment was priceless, I'm still laughing my ass off!


Jun 26, 2007 at 10:17 AM // reply »
33 Comments

Oops, somebody posted in the meawhile, I meant Al's comment.


Jun 26, 2007 at 10:23 AM // reply »
10,638 Comments

@Al

Ha ha ha ha ha, Donkey Sex... and they stick around - that is too funny!

@Joshua,

That Punky Brewster is bananas. I remember when I was in high school or college or something, when suddenly there was a huge buzz about seeing naked and it was all some people could talk about. I never saw her naked, I don't think anyone did, but for a while, it was ALLL anyone wanted to see.


Jun 28, 2007 at 3:42 PM // reply »
1 Comments

Ben, you know whats the worst thing about this post? You'll likely start to rank better for that phrase (I won't say it again) just because you posted about it.


Jul 4, 2007 at 12:21 PM // reply »
168 Comments

Among the search phrases that porn sites are targeting for their SEO, I don't think "Huge Ass" is among the top 10 (or top 50, for that matter). For "big butts," you will indeed see a larger proportion of real porn sites in the SERPs. Also, Google very likely penalizes porn sites for search phrases which are not obviously porny. Google penalizes lots of things. At one point, it was pretty well accepted that Google was penalizing phpBB page names (not sure if they still do this) more than their standard dynamic-page penalization, which pushed a lot more people towards URL rewriting.


Aug 3, 2007 at 9:05 AM // reply »
1 Comments

I laughed my Huge Ass off reading your post. Google is two faced, that's a fact...


Jan
Aug 15, 2007 at 11:13 AM // reply »
6 Comments

Ben,

This post started an interesting process in my mind. I am now thinking of starting a porn site just :D . Nothing commercial, just something for fun. As you mentioned, these sites aren't SEOed too much and maybe it could be worth it a try.

BTW, that video is done perfectly :) . Very funny way of how to tell people the truth.


Aug 16, 2007 at 2:31 PM // reply »
10,638 Comments

@Jan,

You want any help on that, you know where to find me ;)


Jul 1, 2008 at 1:46 PM // reply »
1 Comments

Thanks for that important information, it really helpful..Interesting article


Sep 21, 2009 at 1:34 AM // reply »
1 Comments

Thanks for the important information, please keep me informed



Post A Comment

Comment Etiquette: Please do not post spam. Please keep the comments on-topic. Please do not post unrelated questions or large chunks of code. And, above all, please be nice to each other - we're trying to have a good conversation here.

Please review the following issues:

Author Name:


Author Email:

Author Website:

Comment:

Supported HTML tags for formatting: <strong>bold</strong>   <em>italic</em>   <code>code</code>







  • Help Wanted - Find Your Next ColdFusion Job
InVision App - Prototyping Made Beautiful With Prototyping Tools Ben Nadel's Company - Epicenter Consulting Recent Blog Comments
Feb 3, 2012 at 10:49 PM
How I Got Node.js Running On A Linux Micro Instance Using Amazon EC2
Wow this was really helpful! Only thing I would add is you need to update your .bash_profile after you edit the secure_path. This is what I did: $ . ~/.bash_profile Otherwise, NPM won't be found. ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 10:14 PM
Pushing Base64-Encoded Images Over HTML5 WebSockets With Pusher And ColdFusion
@Ben, Just wanted to let you know that pusher are soon to start limiting sizes on messages. This was the detail that came through in the Feb dispatch: "However, we will soon be limiting the s ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 5:05 PM
Regular Expressions Make CSV Parsing In ColdFusion So Much Easier (And Faster)
I tried using your RegEx in my C# program, but it was matching an extra empty-string at the end and so I would end up with an extra field that doesn't exist, so I changed it to this: (^|,)("(?: ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM
ColdFusion Supports HTTP Verbs PUT And DELETE (As Well As GET And POST)
Josh Cyr posted this on Twitter just a little bit ago. Thought it was appropriate. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1619152/how-to-create-rest-urls-without-verbs/1619677#1619677 ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 2:28 PM
Changing The Execution Context Of Your Self-Executing Function Blocks In JavaScript
@Michael, You definitely make a good point (and extra points for quoting movies - I love movies). When you use a return() statement to define the object's public API, it does provide a consistent a ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 2:04 PM
Changing The Execution Context Of Your Self-Executing Function Blocks In JavaScript
To quote Jurassic Park: "Just because you can doesn't mean you should". I completely, utterly disagree with the thought that this is more readable. Consider the current module pattern: if ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 1:10 PM
REST API Design Rulebook By Mark Masse
@Jordan, Yeah, WRML was created by Mark Masse (author of the book). I also found it to be a bit convoluted. I suppose it is intended to allow the Client to be able to programmaticaly respond to cha ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 1:08 PM
ColdFusion Supports HTTP Verbs PUT And DELETE (As Well As GET And POST)
@Jason, To be honest, I don't have good answers for that kinds of stuff. And, to the point, that is specifically why I *really* liked the REST API Design Rulebook by Mark Masse - he just cuts throu ... read »