Ask Ben: Grabbing World Of Warcraft Data With ColdFusion And CFHTTP

Posted May 18, 2007 at 8:32 AM

Tags: Ask Ben, ColdFusion

You've been doing a lot with XML lately, so I thought maybe you could solve a problem I'm having. I'm a World of Warcraft junky and want to pull data from Blizzard's "armory" web site. It's all XML, so should be easy, but when I do

<cfhttp url="http://armory.worldofwarcraft.com/....." method="get" result="armoryXML">

It returns the full HTML, post style sheet transformation. Yet go to that page and view source and you see the lovely XML. I've seen PHP code that hits the data on this site by doing the PHP equivalent of a cfhttp.

I tried your ColdFusion CFHttp method and did, indeed, get the transformed page content. Then, I went directly to the page in my browser and viewed the source. The source, just as you said it would be, was an XML document with an attached XSLT processing instruction. This was confusing since ColdFusion's CFHttp tag works just like any browser request. So, what's different between the CFHttp request and the browser's request that would render different content?

There is nothing about this that is obvious at all, but if you have worked with CFHttp for a long time, you might know that CFHttp causes problems because the user agent it broadcasts is that of the ColdFusion server's HTTP agent. So, when you go to a site with your FireFox or Internet Explorer browser, the browser generally broadcasts its user agent as a Mozilla or MSIE compatible browser but ColdFusion, on the other hand, announces itself as the "ColdFusion" user agent.

Knowing this, I did a little experiment, making your ColdFusion CFHttp call in two ways: one with no explicit user agent and one with the FireFox user agent:

 Launch code in new window » Download code as text file »

  • <!---
  • Store the user agent that I am using with my browser
  • (you're damn right I use FireFox!). I am breaking this
  • data into two lines for display purposes ONLY.
  • --->
  • <cfset strUserAgent = (
  • "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; " &
  • "rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3"
  • ) />
  •  
  •  
  • <!---
  • Get the target URL that we are grabbing. This page
  • provides an XML document with an XSL transformation
  • processing instruction. We want to grab the XML without
  • the data being transformed into HTML. I am breaking this
  • data into two lines for display purposes ONLY.
  • --->
  • <cfset strURL = (
  • "http://armory.worldofwarcraft.com/character-sheet.xml" &
  • "?r=Bloodhoof&n=Castlereagh"
  • ) />
  •  
  •  
  • <!---
  • Grab the target page without sending across any user agent
  • information. When we do this, ColdFusion automatically puts
  • in "ColdFusion" as the browser's user agent value.
  • --->
  • <cfhttp
  • url="#strURL#"
  • method="GET"
  • result="objHTTP"
  • />
  •  
  •  
  • <!---
  • Now, let's grab the same page, but this time, instead of
  • letting ColdFusion send over a default user agent, we are
  • going to explicitly define what user agent the HTTP reuqest
  • should announce.
  • --->
  • <cfhttp
  • url="#strURL#"
  • method="GET"
  • result="objHTTPWithUA"
  • useragent="#strUserAgent#"
  • />
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • <!---
  • Let's output the leading characters of the request without
  • the user agent value.
  • --->
  • <p>
  • <strong>Request With ColdFusion User Agent</strong>:
  • </p>
  •  
  • <p>
  • #HtmlEditFormat(
  • Left( objHTTP.FileContent, 500 )
  • )#
  • </p>
  •  
  •  
  • <!---
  • Let's output the leading characters of the request in which
  • we explicitly defined the FireFox user agent.
  • --->
  • <p>
  • <strong>Request With FireFox User Agent</strong>:
  • </p>
  •  
  • <p>
  • #HtmlEditFormat(
  • Left( objHTTPWithUA.FileContent, 500 )
  • )#
  • </p>

Running the above code, we get the following screen output:

Request With ColdFusion User Agent:

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/layout/character-sheet.xsl"> <html> <head> <title>The Armory</title> <script src="/shared/global/third-party/detection.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="js/cookies.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="js/armory.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="js/functions.js" type="text/javascript"></script><s

Request With FireFox User Agent:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/layout/character-sheet.xsl"?> <page globalSearch="1" lang="en_us" requestUrl="/character-sheet.xml"> <characterInfo> <character battleGroup="Ruin" charUrl="r=Bloodhoof&amp;n=Castlereagh" class="Hunter" classId="3" faction="Alliance" factionId="0" gender="Male" genderId="0" guildName="Veni Vidi Vici" guildUrl="r=Bloodhoof&amp;n=Veni+Vidi+Vici&amp;p=1" lastModified="May 18, 2007" level="70" name="Castlereagh" rac

As you can see, the first request in which we do not define a user agent (therefore letting "ColdFusion" be announced) sends us back the fully transformed HTML page complete with HTML, HEAD, and TITLE tags. But, in the second ColdFusion CFHttp request, where we announce the request as coming from a FireFox compatible browser, the true XML document is returned complete with XSLT, DocType, PAGE, and CHARACTERINFO XML nodes.

Now, just because I figured out what was going wrong, that does not mean that I can offer any insight into why this is happening. I assume this is just some functionality somewhere that is trying to be "clever" by servering up the content that it thinks the requester wants to see. And, for some reason, it assumes that FireFox wants the XML, but the ColdFusion request wants the transformed HTML page. Who knows... maybe someone reading this can offer more insight in that respect.

Download Code Snippet ZIP File

Post Comment  |  Ask Ben  |  Permalink  |  Other Searches  |  Print Page




Learning ColdFusion 9 - ColdFusion 9 tutorials, samples, examples, demos

Reader Comments

May 18, 2007 at 9:40 AM // reply »
20 Comments

Thanks Ben! You're my hero!


May 18, 2007 at 10:35 AM // reply »
5,406 Comments

@Jamie,

Always glad to help out :)


May 18, 2007 at 2:59 PM // reply »
36 Comments

All you have to do is pout World of Warcraft in the title, and you've got my attention! ;)

I'm going to play with this tomorrow if I have time, I wonder what kind of cool stuff you can do...


May 18, 2007 at 5:05 PM // reply »
1 Comments

I have only recently started blogging but my first couple of entries were on this very topic. Hopefully your other readers will find it useful. I should finish with an entry on how to breakout raiders by role using the armory data later this weekend:

http://blog.shooksweb.com/index.cfm/2007/4/20/Pulling-World-of-Warcraft-Armory-data-with-Coldfusion
http://blog.shooksweb.com/index.cfm/2007/4/25/World-of-Warcraft-Armory-Data
http://blog.shooksweb.com/index.cfm/2007/4/26/Burning-Crusade-Progress-Page
http://blog.shooksweb.com/index.cfm/2007/5/5/Burning-Crusade-Progress-Page-Part-2


May 19, 2007 at 1:31 AM // reply »
20 Comments

@Matt

Very nice! Wish I knew about your work months ago! I searched all over in February for other folks doing armory scraping with CF, only found ASP and PHP users. I had first wanted to pull armory data because I too was hosting my guild's web site. Then one evening the guild leader decided to go to a paid site, saying mine didn't have enough features. Yet he never requested I add anything that the other site had that he viewed as a must-have. I gave the guild the bird and switched servers. Now I just want the armory data to see what sorts of interesting things I can come up with and to practice some with XML manipulation.

If there's room for another developer on your guild's site, drop me a line.


May 19, 2007 at 1:34 AM // reply »
20 Comments

And here's the original PHP site I found with armory stuff http://wow.tachyonsix.com/armory/. This guy caches all data for 12 hours, I wonder how much disk space that uses. The code's open source, might be helpful for developing more tools.


May 27, 2007 at 11:27 AM // reply »
1 Comments

like it


Jun 12, 2007 at 10:18 PM // reply »
1 Comments

I actually thought you were playing World of Warcraft as well. However, I am going to take you up on the offer of posting this as a comment to this topic. I assume readers of this topic are WoW players, so this offer is more targeted at them:

We recently released a World of Warcraft Paladin Guide:
http://www.killerguides.com/guides/wow/guide/world-of-warcraft/paladin

Right now we are seeking a few reviewers who can provide us with some additional feedback. If you run a community site or blog we can also provide you with some copies as contest prizes (please use the contact form on the site to get in touch with me).


Danny
Jun 28, 2007 at 9:20 AM // reply »
1 Comments

I'm guessing the reason for this is that Firefox/IE are known to support all the different technologies used by the armory (xsl, ajax etc.), whereas any less-advanced browser might not, so to make sure the content is readable, they're sending a simplified version, which might work on something like a mobile phone! :-)


Jun 28, 2007 at 9:30 AM // reply »
20 Comments

lol, armory on your cell phone! "I wish I knew how I did in PVP last night, but I'm stuck in this all day meeting, I can't get on the armory to check! ... Oh wait, I can!"


Jul 4, 2007 at 3:44 AM // reply »
1 Comments

If u like this you can go to
http://www.powerleveling-wow-powerleveling.com
to try best wow powerleveling service


John
Sep 13, 2007 at 7:07 PM // reply »
1 Comments

Thank you, thank you, thank you!

This annoying problem had me stumped for hours.

In my case, I was using stanard Java classes to make the requests.


cafurcio
Jan 31, 2008 at 2:53 PM // reply »
1 Comments

Thanks very much!

You lit a light in my particular tunnel!


World of Warcraft Cheats
Aug 27, 2008 at 8:29 PM // reply »
1 Comments

I think this entire thing might be a load of junk personally. Sites have been taking info for a long time now. Its not like something new has entered the filed. Just look at the mmorpg sites or the other database sites out there. Thats 100% what they are doing to help them get all the info from the game and advertise there things.


Post Comment  |  Ask Ben

Recent Blog Comments
Justice
Jul 3, 2009 at 11:10 PM
Create A Running Average Without Storing Individual Values
@Ben, I think you're going about this the wrong way. You're trying to use complicated techniques when there is a simple and beautiful technique readily available (a la Gary Funk's comment). Instead ... read »
Bob
Jul 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM
Project HUGE: Huge In A Hurry - Get Big - Phase 3 / Week 1
a good technical explanation http://crossfitphoenix.typepad.com/crossfit_phoenix_forging_/the-overhead-squat.html ... read »
Jul 3, 2009 at 9:03 PM
Create A Running Average Without Storing Individual Values
If I wanted to do this and only carry two numbers, I'd keep track of the sum and N. Then you are pretty much accurate all the time. average = (sum + new_number) / (N + 1) But all this was in a for ... read »
Roland Collins
Jul 3, 2009 at 8:58 PM
Create A Running Average Without Storing Individual Values
@Martin - not just floating point though. Depending on what langauge you're working in, decimals can cause just as many headaches if they're not precise enough. But again, for most applications, th ... read »
Isnogood
Jul 3, 2009 at 7:16 PM
Project HUGE: Huge In A Hurry - Get Big - Phase 3 / Week 1
Watch this http://www.nsca-lift.org/videos/default.shtml ... read »
Aaron
Jul 3, 2009 at 7:13 PM
Project HUGE: Get Big, Phase One (Chat Waterbury - Huge In A Hurry)
I've just finished the 3rd week of phase 3, and have to agree that the overhead squats are hard. I think this is most due to the wide grip on which places more pressure on your upper back. Only this ... read »
Isnogood
Jul 3, 2009 at 7:11 PM
Project HUGE: Huge In A Hurry - Get Big - Phase 3 / Week 1
Very good, there were some near perfect reps, and there were some dodgy ones, but you're getting there your body position is good. Work on your depth and do not let the bar move forward or backward, ... read »
Martin Mädler
Jul 3, 2009 at 6:48 PM
Create A Running Average Without Storing Individual Values
Nice dodge! I dig the idea to force out the last bit of performance out of a chunk of code, even though it's such a minor thing. Heard of this kinda approach in connection with "running sums". @Rola ... read »