Minor note here, but over on CF-Talk, Rick Root just pointed out a flaw in my understanding of ColdFusion regular expressions. I was under the impression that the period "." would NOT match the new line character or the carriage return character in a target string. I think this is traditionally how regular expressions work (or maybe not). It turns out, that this is dead wrong. The "." character DOES match new lines and carriage returns. I am not sure if this changed in MX(?7) or if I just never learned in properly.
- <cfsavecontent variable="strText">
- <a href="http://www.google.com"
- <!--- Replace tags. --->
- #REReplaceNoCase( strText, "</?[a-z].*?>", "", "ALL" )#
Looking For A New Job?
- PROJECT MANAGER (REMOTE / ONSITE) at SiteVision, Inc.
- Ruby Developer at Cavulus
- 10+ Year ColdFusion Developer to Manage CF Existing Website at AtPrime Media Services
- ColdFusion Developer at ClearCapital.com
- ColdFusion Developer at Digital Community Holdings
Yep, this has always been the case. From "Ben Forta's Advanced CFMX Application Development" (3rd ed.);
"It's important to understand that in ColdFusion MX, the dot character always matches newlines, which is not always the case with Perl."
Good to know this (despite the fact it says it clearly in the docs, right back to CF5... who RTFMs? ;-)
I just ass-u-me`d that CF followed the practice set by PERL and Java. No. That would be too sensible.
Cheers for the heads-up.
I think the problem is that I read the text book and learned a lot about ColdFusion before I even learned how to use Regular Expressions. So, by the time I knew what they were and how to apply them, I was no longer learning from the documentation... I was learning from google'd examples of regular expressions.
Other's have said this, but Perl does it the way you stated, Ben. From the Perl docs: ". matches any single character except a newline". And ColdFusion regular expressions are based on the Perl syntax, but apparently they took liberties. :)
I just found out that you can also remove new lines by doing:
Boyan, excellent point. Just a follow up, that would only work if you don't mind losing other line breaks (outside of tags).