Different Browsers Use Different Non-Matching Captured RegEx Pattern Values

Posted May 7, 2010 at 8:40 AM by Ben Nadel

Tags: Javascript / DHTML

Yesterday, Alec Perkins brought it to my attention that Chrome was passing in an undefined value for a non-matching, captured group in a regular expression (RegEx) replace function. This is a different behavior than Firefox, which passes in an empty string for non-matching, captured groups. I typically only test my Javascript in Firefox (yes, it's a bad habit); so, after hearing this, I wanted to test this feature in a few different browsers to see how they all behaved. The demo for the experiment is quite simple - I'm just matching a pattern than has an optional, but non-matched group:

  • <!DOCTYPE HTML>
  • <html>
  • <head>
  • <title>Javascript String Replace Data Types</title>
  • <script type="text/javascript">
  •  
  • // Create a string to test.
  • var test = "You are just too sexy!";
  •  
  • // Create a pattern to match a sub-string with an optional
  • // capturing group - "way" is not required.
  • var pattern = new RegExp( "((way )?too sexy)", "gi" );
  •  
  • // Loop over the matches, passing each set of captured groups
  • // to the given function. In this case, the second captured
  • // group will be the OPTIONAL part of the pattern.
  • test.replace(
  • pattern,
  • function( $0, $1, $2 ){
  •  
  • // Alert the TYPE of data type passed-in for the non-
  • // captured group value.
  • alert( typeof( $2 ) );
  •  
  • // Alert the boolean-cast of the group.
  • alert( !!$2 );
  •  
  • }
  • );
  •  
  • </script>
  • </head>
  • <body>
  • <!--- Left intentially blank. --->
  • </body>
  • </html>

Here, I am looking for the regular expression pattern:

"((way )?too sexy)"

In this pattern, the substring, "way ", is an optional, captured group and will, in fact, not be matched in our test string, "You are just too sexy!". In this scenario, we can then see how the different browsers pass in the second captured (but not matched) group.

I tested this in Firefox, Chrome, IE, and Safari and here is what we get:

Firefox:
string
false

Chrome:
undefined
false

Safari:
undefined
false

IE:
undefined
false

As it turns out, Firefox is the odd man out here, being the only browser that passes in an empty string for non-matching groups. All of the other browsers pass in "undefined" / null data types for non-matching groups. While this difference is strange, the upside is that both empty strings and undefined values are "falsey" values in Javascript and can be implicitly cast to False for control flow decisions. I know some people frown upon the use of truthy / falsey values as Conditions, but when different browsers pass in different falsey data types, this feature really helps us to simplify our control flow logic.

Note to self: be sure to test Javascript in at least two browsers!




Reader Comments

Jun 14, 2010 at 10:24 AM // reply »
168 Comments

This is a Firefox bug in the handling of nonparticipating capturing groups. The following (old) post of mine lists additional related browser bugs and other info: http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/npcg-javascript


Jun 14, 2010 at 2:13 PM // reply »
10,640 Comments

@Steve,

Ahh, bug! Thanks for the link. I'll be checking out your regex know-how :)


Post A Comment

Comment Etiquette: Please do not post spam. Please keep the comments on-topic. Please do not post unrelated questions or large chunks of code. And, above all, please be nice to each other - we're trying to have a good conversation here.

Please review the following issues:

Author Name:


Author Email:

Author Website:

Comment:

Supported HTML tags for formatting: <strong>bold</strong>   <em>italic</em>   <code>code</code>







  • Help Wanted - Find Your Next ColdFusion Job
InVision App - Prototyping Made Beautiful With Prototyping Tools Ben Nadel's Company - Epicenter Consulting Recent Blog Comments
Feb 8, 2012 at 11:09 AM
Building A Fixed-Position Bottom Menu Bar (ala FaceBook)
Here's a warning about using fixed top or bottom menu bars that hasn't been mentioned. Browsers don't factor fixed bars into the page height for page up and page down, meaning you'll have anything f ... read »
Feb 8, 2012 at 10:32 AM
Building A Twitter-Inspired RESTful API Architecture In ColdFusion
@Andy, Ah, very cool. FW/1 really seems to be quite well-rounded these days! ... read »
Feb 8, 2012 at 9:52 AM
Building A Twitter-Inspired RESTful API Architecture In ColdFusion
Just wanted to let you know that version 2.0 of Sean Corfield's FW/1 supports routing. This allows you to build true RESTful APIs using ColdFusion. (search for "URL Routes" https://github ... read »
Feb 8, 2012 at 2:05 AM
Creating A Fixed-Length Queue In JavaScript Using Arrays
Cool site ... read »
Feb 7, 2012 at 5:00 PM
Ask Ben: Ending ColdFusion Session When User Closes Browser
We've used code that sets the cookies without the "expires" attribute in most of our applications to accommodate an "automatic logoff" (Let's face it, that's what we're really try ... read »
Feb 7, 2012 at 10:10 AM
Ask Ben: Building An AJAX, jQuery, And ColdFusion Powered Application
Hey Ben great post. Just like @Carl Steinhilber I am having the same trouble with the -'parseerror'. But I can only reach GET contacts-demo.cfm I have added secureJSON="no" ... read »
ang
Feb 7, 2012 at 4:46 AM
Using The Apple iPod Shuffle Without iTunes
i got the same error with munkey!! help please!! ... read »
Feb 7, 2012 at 2:48 AM
Ask Ben: Javascript String Replace Method
@Kadut, . is a special character you will need to escape it \. ... read »