jQuery Mouse Events: PageX/Y vs. ClientX/Y

Posted March 8, 2010 at 9:19 AM by Ben Nadel

Tags: Javascript / DHTML

When I first starting playing with jQuery events, a lot of what I learned about the jQuery Event object was through trial and error. While I could be remembering incorrectly, I used to find that the jQuery documentation was good at describing the event handlers, but not so good at describing the event object; as such, while I knew that the jQuery event object was a standardized event object, I was never 100% sure which parts of it I was supposed to be using.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Through my trial and error, I started to use the clientX and clientY mouse coordinates in the jQuery event object. These coordinates gave me the X and Y offset of the mouse relative to the top-left corner of the browser's view port. As I was reading the jQuery 1.4 Reference Guide by Karl Swedberg and Jonathan Chaffer, however, I saw that they often referred to the pageX and pageY coordinates. After checking the updated jQuery documentation, I saw that these were the coordinates standardized by jQuery; and, I saw that they gave me the X and Y offset of the mouse relative to the entire document (not just the view port).

To see the difference between these two coordinate systems, I set up a page that would log mouse click events against a visible coordinate grid.

  • <!DOCTYPE HTML>
  • <html>
  • <head>
  • <title>jQuery Mouse Events: ClientX vs. PageX</title>
  • <style type="text/css">
  •  
  • div.grid {
  • border: 1px solid #CCCCCC ;
  • cursor: pointer ;
  • font: 10px verdana ;
  • height: 99px ;
  • position: absolute ;
  • width: 99px ;
  • z-index: 100 ;
  • }
  •  
  • </style>
  • <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery-1.4.2.js"></script>
  • <script type="text/javascript">
  •  
  • // I draw the grid on the document.
  • function createGrid(){
  • var body = $( "body" );
  •  
  • // Draw the X axis.
  • for (var x = 0 ; x <= 2000 ; x += 100){
  •  
  • // Draw the Y axis.
  • for (var y = 0 ; y <= 2000 ; y += 100){
  •  
  • $( "<div class='grid'></div>" )
  • .appendTo( body )
  • .css({
  • left: (x + "px"),
  • top: (y + "px")
  • })
  • .text( x + "," + y )
  • ;
  •  
  • }
  •  
  • }
  • };
  •  
  •  
  • // When the DOM is ready, initialize the scripts.
  • jQuery(function( $ ){
  •  
  • // Create the grid for coordinate affordance.
  • createGrid();
  •  
  • // Bind the mouse event to the document so that we
  • // can see what kind of coordinates we have to play
  • // with.
  • $( document ).click(
  • function( event ){
  •  
  • // Client variables.
  • console.log(
  • "clientX/Y: " +
  • event.clientX + ", " +
  • event.clientY
  • );
  •  
  • // Page variables. NOTE: These are the ones
  • // that are officially supported by the
  • // jQuery Event object.
  • console.log(
  • "pageX/Y: " +
  • event.pageX + ", " +
  • event.pageY
  • );
  •  
  • // Hrule.
  • console.log( "......" );
  •  
  • }
  • );
  •  
  • });
  •  
  • </script>
  • </head>
  • <body>
  • <!-- Nothing needed here. -->
  • </body>
  • </html>

As you can see, I create a 2000 x 2000 pixel grid that will give me both horizontal and vertical scrolling. And, when I scroll both right and down, and then click on the document, I get the following console output:

 
 
 
 
 
 
jQuery Event Object Uses PageX And PageY As The Standardized Mouse Event Coordinates. 
 
 
 

As you can see, the clientX and clientY coordinates give me the mouse position relative to the view port, regardless of the scroll of the document. The pageX and pageY coordinates, on the other hand, give me the mouse position relative to the top, left of the entire document, again regardless of the scrolling.

Which mouse event coordinates you should be using is not really a question for debate - the pageX and pageY coordinates are the ones that have been standardized by jQuery. In order to keep your code as cross-browser compatible as possible, you should rely on pageX and pageY. It is unfortunate that I did not know about this until just recently - I am quite sure that I have posted a lot of code that accidentally relied on the proprietary event properties, clientX and clientY.




Reader Comments

Mar 8, 2010 at 11:58 AM // reply »
1 Comments

Thanks a lot for this post! Good that you took notice of it : this will be helpful for my map browser.


Mar 8, 2010 at 12:09 PM // reply »
10,638 Comments

@Philippe,

The standardization of the jQuery event object is nice... especially when you finally know what the standard actually is ;)


Mar 8, 2010 at 7:13 PM // reply »
1 Comments

I've been trying to find a way to determine the X/Y mouse coordinates in relation to a given element. That way I could tell if my mouse is the left 50% of a given <div>, or the top 33% of a given image and show/hide things appropriately.

Is there a way to extrapolate the pageX/Y into coords related to a certain element.


Mar 8, 2010 at 7:29 PM // reply »
10,638 Comments

@Scott,

For something like that, I would use the offset() of the given element in conjunction with the pageX/pageY.

I use this approach a lot, but have not pointed it out specifically. I'll write up a quick post and paste a link here.


Mar 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM // reply »
10,638 Comments

@Scott,

Take a look at this exploration:

http://www.bennadel.com/blog/1871-Translating-Global-jQuery-Event-Coordinates-To-A-Local-Context.htm


Mar 9, 2010 at 1:00 PM // reply »
1 Comments

Very good article. Opened up my mind to many cool possibilities.

Thanks, I want to try this on the map.


Mar 10, 2010 at 10:07 PM // reply »
10,638 Comments

@Peter,

Glad you like it. Drop another comment if you come up with some cool ways to use this.


Rex
Mar 30, 2010 at 10:47 PM // reply »
1 Comments

thanks a lot,


Apr 29, 2010 at 9:13 AM // reply »
1 Comments

Very useful. I've been using pageX/pageY as this is what I learnt initially, so I guess thats a bonus!

On the other hand, I do see some benefits of having both values, as it can often be useful to know *where* in the page the visitors browser is viewing. I wouldn't necessarily ignore clientX/clientY usage because, for the right task, namely some fancy jQuery-based animation, this is exactly what is needed.

Am I wrong to suggest this?
I think advanced jQuery visuals on sites would probably rely on a mixture of client/page/X/Y along with offset() and many other jQuery blessings.


May 16, 2010 at 10:43 PM // reply »
10,638 Comments

@Rhys,

I think both sets of values definitely have their place. The big question is - can you rely on the clientX/clientY to always be there? The beauty of the jQuery library is that it standardizes what is available in the event object; according to the docs, they promise to supply the pageX/pageY, not the clientX/clientY. So, while I have used it without problem, I am not sure that means that it will always hold the values you expect.


May 27, 2010 at 3:34 AM // reply »
1 Comments

The Compatibility information listed at http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/w3c_cssom.html
infact shows clientX,clientY to be the one consistent on most browsers. So it should be safe using clientX,clientY right ?


Jun 7, 2010 at 10:56 PM // reply »
10,638 Comments

@Jitendra,

I am not sure how to best answer that. Even if it is most consistent, we are using a library that standardizes on a given set of properties. I think , if we use the library (jQuery), then we need to depend more on what they standardize on. But, as I said in the blog post, I was using the wrong ones for a while without any problem... so it appears to be quite safe by coincidence.


Nov 5, 2010 at 10:19 PM // reply »
2 Comments

hi, thank you for the good article.

if I have <div style="height:600px;width:800px;overflow:auto;"> with 2 scollbars. How to determine mouse position. if I scroll down/right, the pageX/pageY show same numbers.


Nov 5, 2010 at 11:57 PM // reply »
2 Comments

@rick,

after google search, scrollTop() is what I want. :-)


DA
Aug 18, 2011 at 2:45 PM // reply »
1 Comments

I've been a bit confused about this. Every bit of documentation I can find seems to say to use pageX/pageY. However, that always returns 0 for me in my jQuery on an iPhone. After some digging, I came across this page:

https://github.com/jquery/jquery-mobile/issues/734

which has some sample code with this comment in it:

// (in iOS event.pageX and event.pageY are always 0 )

which seems to back up my conclusion. I don't know if this is a failing of mobile safari or of jQuery, but it seems that pageX and pageY isn't usable on iOS.


Dec 15, 2011 at 5:57 AM // reply »
1 Comments

Thank you Ben Nadal for providing us a useful knowledge, but I have some concerns about using the PageX,Y as a standard relative.

I mean that if I have to show something relative to viewport and also under the mouse hover (mouse position relative to view ports' x and y-axis), In that case how can I find the mouse position relative to viewport, if I use e.pageY then it will return me the coordinate related to the full browser?

Thanks,
Hussain


Jan 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM // reply »
1 Comments

good one.....



Post A Comment

Comment Etiquette: Please do not post spam. Please keep the comments on-topic. Please do not post unrelated questions or large chunks of code. And, above all, please be nice to each other - we're trying to have a good conversation here.

Please review the following issues:

Author Name:


Author Email:

Author Website:

Comment:

Supported HTML tags for formatting: <strong>bold</strong>   <em>italic</em>   <code>code</code>







  • Help Wanted - Find Your Next ColdFusion Job
InVision App - Prototyping Made Beautiful With Prototyping Tools Ben Nadel's Company - Epicenter Consulting Recent Blog Comments
Feb 3, 2012 at 10:49 PM
How I Got Node.js Running On A Linux Micro Instance Using Amazon EC2
Wow this was really helpful! Only thing I would add is you need to update your .bash_profile after you edit the secure_path. This is what I did: $ . ~/.bash_profile Otherwise, NPM won't be found. ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 10:14 PM
Pushing Base64-Encoded Images Over HTML5 WebSockets With Pusher And ColdFusion
@Ben, Just wanted to let you know that pusher are soon to start limiting sizes on messages. This was the detail that came through in the Feb dispatch: "However, we will soon be limiting the s ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 5:05 PM
Regular Expressions Make CSV Parsing In ColdFusion So Much Easier (And Faster)
I tried using your RegEx in my C# program, but it was matching an extra empty-string at the end and so I would end up with an extra field that doesn't exist, so I changed it to this: (^|,)("(?: ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM
ColdFusion Supports HTTP Verbs PUT And DELETE (As Well As GET And POST)
Josh Cyr posted this on Twitter just a little bit ago. Thought it was appropriate. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1619152/how-to-create-rest-urls-without-verbs/1619677#1619677 ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 2:28 PM
Changing The Execution Context Of Your Self-Executing Function Blocks In JavaScript
@Michael, You definitely make a good point (and extra points for quoting movies - I love movies). When you use a return() statement to define the object's public API, it does provide a consistent a ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 2:04 PM
Changing The Execution Context Of Your Self-Executing Function Blocks In JavaScript
To quote Jurassic Park: "Just because you can doesn't mean you should". I completely, utterly disagree with the thought that this is more readable. Consider the current module pattern: if ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 1:10 PM
REST API Design Rulebook By Mark Masse
@Jordan, Yeah, WRML was created by Mark Masse (author of the book). I also found it to be a bit convoluted. I suppose it is intended to allow the Client to be able to programmaticaly respond to cha ... read »
Feb 3, 2012 at 1:08 PM
ColdFusion Supports HTTP Verbs PUT And DELETE (As Well As GET And POST)
@Jason, To be honest, I don't have good answers for that kinds of stuff. And, to the point, that is specifically why I *really* liked the REST API Design Rulebook by Mark Masse - he just cuts throu ... read »