Viewing jQuery DOM Event Bindings With FireBug

Posted October 5, 2009 at 10:27 AM by Ben Nadel

Tags: Javascript / DHTML

The ease with which we can bind events to DOM elements using jQuery is a huge part of what makes jQuery so awesome. But, as with many things that are wired-up programmatically, when something doesn't work, it can be hard to figure out where it went wrong. One cool tip that I picked up reading Cody Lindley's jQuery Enlightenment book is that jQuery-bound events are actually stored in the data() method using the "events" key. This means that if we need to, we can use FireBug at runtime to inspect the events that are bound to a given DOM element.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The one caveat here (and maybe this is just my ignorance to the way in which FireBug works) is that we can't just inspect the DOM element to view the bound events. This is because the data() method doesn't actually store the data with the given DOM element; rather, it stores the data internally to jQuery using a unique ID that it attaches to the given DOM element. As such, to view the bound events, we'll actually need to call the data( "events" ) method on the given DOM element from the FireBug console command line.

But, it gets even more complicated than that - we need a way to reference the given DOM element in a unique way so that we can access it using a jQuery selector. In order to accomplish this, I created a script that uses advanced jQuery filtering to find all the DOM elements that have bound events and add a unique class name to them. This way, I can use the unique class name to access the DOM element from the FireBug console command line.

  • <!DOCTYPE HTML>
  • <html>
  • <head>
  • <title>Viewing Events Attached To The DOM</title>
  • <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery-1.3.2.js"></script>
  • <script type="text/javascript">
  •  
  • // When the DOM is ready, initialize scripts.
  • $(function(){
  •  
  • // Attach click event to first link.
  • $( "a.event" )
  • .attr( "href", "javascript:void( 0 )" )
  • .click(
  • function( event ){
  • alert( "Hello There!" );
  •  
  • // Cancel default event.
  • return( false );
  • }
  • )
  • ;
  •  
  •  
  • // Attach the reveal event click event. This will
  • // highlight all of the evented links in gold and
  • // attached a unique class name so that we can
  • // easily grab that link with a jQuery selector.
  • $( "a.reveal" )
  • .attr( "href", "javascript:void( 0 )" )
  • .click(
  • function( event ){
  • var counter = 1;
  •  
  • // Find all of the items on the page that
  • // have events attached to them. We will
  • // use advanced filtering to get this.
  • $( "*" )
  • .filter(function(){
  • // Return only items that have the
  • // events data item.
  • return( $( this ).data( "events" ) );
  • })
  • .css( "background-color", "gold" )
  • .each(
  • function(){
  • $( this ).addClass( "evt" + counter++ );
  • }
  • )
  • ;
  •  
  • // Cancel default event.
  • return( false );
  • }
  • )
  • ;
  •  
  • });
  •  
  • </script>
  • </head>
  • <body>
  •  
  • <h1>
  • Viewing Events Attached To The DOM
  • </h1>
  •  
  • <p>
  • Click
  • <a href="##" class="event">this link</a> and
  • <a href="##" class="event">that link</a>
  • </p>
  •  
  • <p>
  • <a href="##" class="reveal">Reveal event'ed items.</a>
  • </p>
  •  
  • </body>
  • </html>

As you can see above, once the "reveal" link is pressed, all event-having DOM elements are located and assigned a unique class name in the form of "evtX". This class name can then be leveraged to output the bound events:

  • $( ".evtX" ).data( "events" );

Of course, you could also just edit the HTML using FireBug, added a custom class name, and do the same thing. Either way, it's cool that this is possible.




Reader Comments

Oct 5, 2009 at 11:20 AM // reply »
1 Comments

Much (definitely not all) of the time, the new(ish) versions of Firebug (at least in FF3.5+) already show attached events inline on the HTML tab.


Oct 5, 2009 at 11:21 AM // reply »
26 Comments

That's an interesting tidbit of information, Ben: thanks for sharing it.


Oct 5, 2009 at 11:31 AM // reply »
11,246 Comments

@Christoph,

Oh good to know. I'll have to check to see if I'm rocking the latest version.


Oct 5, 2009 at 12:40 PM // reply »
7 Comments

the FireQuery plugin for FireBug shows all jQuery .data() and such directly in the HTML view of Firebug, along with a bunch of other nifty features. A+++, Would DL Again!

http://firequery.binaryage.com/


Oct 6, 2009 at 5:15 AM // reply »
1 Comments

thx Ben. Love to see your tutorials.


Oct 6, 2009 at 7:48 AM // reply »
11,246 Comments

@ajpiano,

Oh awesome, I'll have to check that out. Thanks!


Oct 14, 2009 at 5:56 AM // reply »
2 Comments

As you said, maybe not that practical, but if you make a bookmarklet out of this, it would be really useful!


Oct 15, 2009 at 8:25 AM // reply »
11,246 Comments

@Francois,

Cool idea. Also, I took at look at FireQuery as recommended by Adam and it is really cool. I would recommend checking it out.


Oct 15, 2009 at 8:47 AM // reply »
2 Comments

Yes, FireQuery is cool, but lately I use Google Chrome & its Inspector (kind of like a built-in Firebug). The boormarklet will be useful for us Chromians.


Nov 30, 2009 at 2:37 PM // reply »
1 Comments

you can use http://getfirebug.com/


Aug 23, 2010 at 2:23 PM // reply »
1 Comments

Thanks for the share. This has been driving me crazy for a while. I hate combing through JQuery code trying to find selectors that could match what I am trying to find bindings for. My problem may be more in the way we are using our JQuery which is more procedural, and less object oriented.


Aug 23, 2010 at 9:01 PM // reply »
11,246 Comments

@Ben,

jQuery code, with all of the event binding, can be really hard to debug. And, if you didn't write the originally code - forget about it :) Being able to see the events bound to an object makes debugging it (or at least easier to find where the functions may be defined).


May 3, 2012 at 6:36 AM // reply »
1 Comments

.data("events") doesn't work with jQuery 1.5.1.

Any suggestions?
Thanks.


Jun 3, 2012 at 3:56 AM // reply »
1 Comments

I am one who likes to take a sneak peak in what others have done on their sites but always kept on wondering if this is so difficult and its a problem I am only facing. With time sure development of jquery apps will become lot more easier.



Post A Comment

Comment Etiquette: Please do not post spam. Please keep the comments on-topic. Please do not post unrelated questions or large chunks of code. And, above all, please be nice to each other - we're trying to have a good conversation here.

Please review the following issues:

Author Name:


Author Email:

Author Website:

Comment:

Supported HTML tags for formatting: <strong>bold</strong>   <em>italic</em>   <code>code</code>







  • Help Wanted - Find Your Next ColdFusion Job
Ben Nadel's Company - Epicenter Consulting Recent Blog Comments
May 24, 2013 at 5:39 PM
Ask Ben: Manually Enforcing Basic HTTP Authorization In ColdFusion
@Adam Oops! My mistake! I hadn't gotten that far in my testing - I'm still baby stepping my way through the process. ... read »
May 24, 2013 at 5:13 PM
Ask Ben: Manually Enforcing Basic HTTP Authorization In ColdFusion
Hi Jason, Thanks for checking up on that, but I still stand firm on my position. :) There are actually two listLast()'s in use, and you're right that the one using a space as a delimiter is fine. ... read »
May 24, 2013 at 4:45 PM
Ask Ben: Manually Enforcing Basic HTTP Authorization In ColdFusion
@Ben I have been lurking your site for quite some time, and haven't stepped up to comment until today. Thanks for all the great info - keep it up! @Adam I believe you are mistaken... as the commen ... read »
May 24, 2013 at 11:21 AM
Strange Interaction Between DeserializeJson(), ArrayContains(), And Database Values In ColdFusion
@WebManWalking, Ha ha, let's us never speak of justifying "##" notation again :P ... read »
May 24, 2013 at 11:18 AM
Strange Interaction Between DeserializeJson(), ArrayContains(), And Database Values In ColdFusion
@Ben, Ah, so it was indeed how I vaguely remembered it to be: A direct assignment value = users.id[ i ] causes value to retain the sticky datatype of the query column. Although unnecessary in ... read »
May 24, 2013 at 9:11 AM
Preventing Links In Standalone iPhone Applications From Opening In Mobile Safari
@Brandon, Hi, No, I haven't been able to do that. I have just kept it as it is. ... read »
May 23, 2013 at 9:52 PM
Preventing Links In Standalone iPhone Applications From Opening In Mobile Safari
@Muhmmadibn Did you figure out a solution to launching PDFs? I am running into the same issues myself. There is no way to close the PDF or go back once you launch it. Thanks in advance! ... read »
May 23, 2013 at 6:06 PM
The Girl Who Broke My Heart, And Made Me A Better Person
Good day,ladies and gentle men, my name is Dr AMADI the great spell caster in Africa, i have help so many people for different kind of problems,who say there is no solution to problems on earth, that ... read »
InVision App - Prototyping Made Beautiful With Prototyping Tools