Viewing jQuery DOM Event Bindings With FireBug

Posted October 5, 2009 at 10:27 AM by Ben Nadel

Tags: Javascript / DHTML

The ease with which we can bind events to DOM elements using jQuery is a huge part of what makes jQuery so awesome. But, as with many things that are wired-up programmatically, when something doesn't work, it can be hard to figure out where it went wrong. One cool tip that I picked up reading Cody Lindley's jQuery Enlightenment book is that jQuery-bound events are actually stored in the data() method using the "events" key. This means that if we need to, we can use FireBug at runtime to inspect the events that are bound to a given DOM element.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The one caveat here (and maybe this is just my ignorance to the way in which FireBug works) is that we can't just inspect the DOM element to view the bound events. This is because the data() method doesn't actually store the data with the given DOM element; rather, it stores the data internally to jQuery using a unique ID that it attaches to the given DOM element. As such, to view the bound events, we'll actually need to call the data( "events" ) method on the given DOM element from the FireBug console command line.

But, it gets even more complicated than that - we need a way to reference the given DOM element in a unique way so that we can access it using a jQuery selector. In order to accomplish this, I created a script that uses advanced jQuery filtering to find all the DOM elements that have bound events and add a unique class name to them. This way, I can use the unique class name to access the DOM element from the FireBug console command line.

  • <!DOCTYPE HTML>
  • <html>
  • <head>
  • <title>Viewing Events Attached To The DOM</title>
  • <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery-1.3.2.js"></script>
  • <script type="text/javascript">
  •  
  • // When the DOM is ready, initialize scripts.
  • $(function(){
  •  
  • // Attach click event to first link.
  • $( "a.event" )
  • .attr( "href", "javascript:void( 0 )" )
  • .click(
  • function( event ){
  • alert( "Hello There!" );
  •  
  • // Cancel default event.
  • return( false );
  • }
  • )
  • ;
  •  
  •  
  • // Attach the reveal event click event. This will
  • // highlight all of the evented links in gold and
  • // attached a unique class name so that we can
  • // easily grab that link with a jQuery selector.
  • $( "a.reveal" )
  • .attr( "href", "javascript:void( 0 )" )
  • .click(
  • function( event ){
  • var counter = 1;
  •  
  • // Find all of the items on the page that
  • // have events attached to them. We will
  • // use advanced filtering to get this.
  • $( "*" )
  • .filter(function(){
  • // Return only items that have the
  • // events data item.
  • return( $( this ).data( "events" ) );
  • })
  • .css( "background-color", "gold" )
  • .each(
  • function(){
  • $( this ).addClass( "evt" + counter++ );
  • }
  • )
  • ;
  •  
  • // Cancel default event.
  • return( false );
  • }
  • )
  • ;
  •  
  • });
  •  
  • </script>
  • </head>
  • <body>
  •  
  • <h1>
  • Viewing Events Attached To The DOM
  • </h1>
  •  
  • <p>
  • Click
  • <a href="##" class="event">this link</a> and
  • <a href="##" class="event">that link</a>
  • </p>
  •  
  • <p>
  • <a href="##" class="reveal">Reveal event'ed items.</a>
  • </p>
  •  
  • </body>
  • </html>

As you can see above, once the "reveal" link is pressed, all event-having DOM elements are located and assigned a unique class name in the form of "evtX". This class name can then be leveraged to output the bound events:

  • $( ".evtX" ).data( "events" );

Of course, you could also just edit the HTML using FireBug, added a custom class name, and do the same thing. Either way, it's cool that this is possible.




Reader Comments

Oct 5, 2009 at 11:20 AM // reply »
1 Comments

Much (definitely not all) of the time, the new(ish) versions of Firebug (at least in FF3.5+) already show attached events inline on the HTML tab.


Oct 5, 2009 at 11:21 AM // reply »
20 Comments

That's an interesting tidbit of information, Ben: thanks for sharing it.


Oct 5, 2009 at 11:31 AM // reply »
10,640 Comments

@Christoph,

Oh good to know. I'll have to check to see if I'm rocking the latest version.


Oct 5, 2009 at 12:40 PM // reply »
7 Comments

the FireQuery plugin for FireBug shows all jQuery .data() and such directly in the HTML view of Firebug, along with a bunch of other nifty features. A+++, Would DL Again!

http://firequery.binaryage.com/


Oct 6, 2009 at 5:15 AM // reply »
1 Comments

thx Ben. Love to see your tutorials.


Oct 6, 2009 at 7:48 AM // reply »
10,640 Comments

@ajpiano,

Oh awesome, I'll have to check that out. Thanks!


Oct 14, 2009 at 5:56 AM // reply »
2 Comments

As you said, maybe not that practical, but if you make a bookmarklet out of this, it would be really useful!


Oct 15, 2009 at 8:25 AM // reply »
10,640 Comments

@Francois,

Cool idea. Also, I took at look at FireQuery as recommended by Adam and it is really cool. I would recommend checking it out.


Oct 15, 2009 at 8:47 AM // reply »
2 Comments

Yes, FireQuery is cool, but lately I use Google Chrome & its Inspector (kind of like a built-in Firebug). The boormarklet will be useful for us Chromians.


Nov 30, 2009 at 2:37 PM // reply »
1 Comments

you can use http://getfirebug.com/


Aug 23, 2010 at 2:23 PM // reply »
1 Comments

Thanks for the share. This has been driving me crazy for a while. I hate combing through JQuery code trying to find selectors that could match what I am trying to find bindings for. My problem may be more in the way we are using our JQuery which is more procedural, and less object oriented.


Aug 23, 2010 at 9:01 PM // reply »
10,640 Comments

@Ben,

jQuery code, with all of the event binding, can be really hard to debug. And, if you didn't write the originally code - forget about it :) Being able to see the events bound to an object makes debugging it (or at least easier to find where the functions may be defined).


Post A Comment

Comment Etiquette: Please do not post spam. Please keep the comments on-topic. Please do not post unrelated questions or large chunks of code. And, above all, please be nice to each other - we're trying to have a good conversation here.

Please review the following issues:

Author Name:


Author Email:

Author Website:

Comment:

Supported HTML tags for formatting: <strong>bold</strong>   <em>italic</em>   <code>code</code>







  • Help Wanted - Find Your Next ColdFusion Job
InVision App - Prototyping Made Beautiful With Prototyping Tools Ben Nadel's Company - Epicenter Consulting Recent Blog Comments
Feb 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM
jQuery AJAX Strips Script Tags And Inserts Them After Parent-Most Elements
Update! Instead of $(eval(options.insertAfter)).after(data['insertData']); I now use: var ajaxNode = document.createElement('span'); var parent = $(eval(options.insertAfter))[0].parentNode; ... read »
Feb 10, 2012 at 6:18 PM
jQuery AJAX Strips Script Tags And Inserts Them After Parent-Most Elements
encountered this same, what I consider, jQuery bug last week. I'm building a site in which I load some content via AJAX. This content contains Linkedin share button placeholders which Linkedin API ne ... read »
Feb 10, 2012 at 11:30 AM
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) AJAX Requests Between jQuery And Node.js
After you understand the concepts here, this is an awesome cheatsheet for enabling CORS in just about anything http://enable-cors.org/ ... read »
JM
Feb 10, 2012 at 9:10 AM
My Safari Browser SQLite Database Hello World Example
@Amy, Here is a very good tutorial on how to use JOIN: http://www.sqltutorial.org/sqljoin-innerjoin.aspx ... read »
Feb 10, 2012 at 4:42 AM
Building A Twitter-Inspired RESTful API Architecture In ColdFusion
This is great, very useful Ben. I spotted a small typo in the api.cgm listing: <cfthrow type="Unauthroized" /> Cheers Stefan ... read »
Feb 9, 2012 at 10:35 PM
CFDirectory Filtering Uses Pipe Character For Multiple Filters (Thanks Steve Withington)
I was wondering if there would be a filter you could apply so that you got everything but what you included in the filter. As in show me all docs that are not a .pdf. ... read »
Feb 9, 2012 at 10:29 PM
Learning ColdFusion 9: Application-Specific Data Sources
@Ben, No offence, but if people were really wanting advanced features they would be using a platform like ASP.NET MVC. CFML is so structurally compromised as a tag-based scripting language that ... read »
Feb 9, 2012 at 10:03 PM
Subversion - Cleanup Failed To Process The Following Paths
@Leviaguirre, do you still have problems with this? ... read »