Skip to main content
Ben Nadel at the New York ColdFusion User Group (Mar. 2009) with: Jeff Coughlin
Ben Nadel at the New York ColdFusion User Group (Mar. 2009) with: Jeff Coughlin ( @jeffcoughlin )

Learning ColdFusion 9: Ternary Operator Works Around Implicit Array Bug

By on
Tags:

Earlier this week, I examined the updated implicit array and implicit struct creation functionality in ColdFusion 9. While they provide awesome functionality, I was a little disappointed to find out that there is still some sort of improper order of operations in which the left-hand variable is being defined before the right-hand expression is evaluated. This can lead to very strange and buggy behavior as in the following example:

<!--- Create a raw string value. --->
<cfset data = "Simple Value" />

<!---
	Convert the data variable to an array using implicit
	array notation.
--->
<cfset data = [ data ] />

<!--- Output the new data variable. --->
<cfdump
	var="#data#"
	label="Data[ data ]"
	/>

Here, we are converting a simple variable into an array containing the original value. This should work just fine; however, due to the error in order of operations, ColdFusion produces the following data structure:

ColdFusion 9 Still Has Errors In Its Order Of Operations In Implicit Array And Struct Creation.

Clearly, something went horribly wrong.

When I was digging through ColdFusion 9's new ternary operator, I found out that if you use a ternary operator to execute this data transformation, it actually executes properly:

<!--- Create a raw string value. --->
<cfset data = "Simple Value" />

<!---
	Convert the data variable to an array using a
	ternary operator.
--->
<cfset data = (true ? [ data ] : []) />

<!--- Output the new data variable. --->
<cfdump
	var="#data#"
	label="Data ? [ data ]"
	/>

Here, rather than storing [ data ] directly back into the data variable, we are proxying it through the ternary operator. The "false" statement, [], is never to be used. When we run this code, we get the following CFDump:

ColdFusion 9's New Ternary Operator Can Be Used To Work Around The Implicit Array Bug.

As you can see, the simple data value was successfully converted into an array containing the original, simple value. While this might seem rediculous, remember that the condition statement here would most likely be something like:

!isArray( data )

... which would make this much more natural. For a better example, see my post on ColdFusion 9's ternary operator.

This hack does not work with the implicit struct bug; you still end up getting an infinitely nested result.

Now, obviously, the implicit array solution here is not the solution that we ultimately want. Ultimately, we want the final release of ColdFusion 9 to fix the core problem in statement evaluation. But, if you need to overwrite a variable with itself (I found this bug because it's a common use case), this appears to be a reasonable work-around for the time being.

Want to use code from this post? Check out the license.

Reader Comments

15,640 Comments

@Eric,

Converting data types is something that happens more often than you realize, so when ternary operators came along, it felt like a natural thing to try. But, when I tried it, I was like, "wait! isn't that supposed to break?!?"

I believe in love. I believe in compassion. I believe in human rights. I believe that we can afford to give more of these gifts to the world around us because it costs us nothing to be decent and kind and understanding. And, I want you to know that when you land on this site, you are accepted for who you are, no matter how you identify, what truths you live, or whatever kind of goofy shit makes you feel alive! Rock on with your bad self!
Ben Nadel