Project HUGE: Huge In A Hurry - Get Ready - Week Two

Posted March 23, 2009 at 7:52 PM by Ben Nadel

Tags: Health / Fitness, Project HUGE

I just started week two of Chad Waterbury's, Get Ready phase of the Huge In A Hurry fitness program. The Get Ready phase of the program is designed to get you used to working out with Chad's suggested style: Moving heavy stuff fast and lighter stuff faster. Last week, when I began this phase, I think I definitely concentrated to much on the speed aspects of the movement. Meaning, I think I sacrificed weight in favor of speed (and at the expense of form at times). Now, there are going to be times during the program where you want to go lighter; but, my concern was that even on the heavy days (4-6 Rep Max days), I was picking weight that was too light for the Rep Max (RM) range. Only, I didn't realize this because at the speed I was trying to move it, it "felt" like a 4-6 RM (or rather, it was at 4-6 reps that my faster speed slowed down).

This week, as I enter week 2 of the Get Ready phase, I am trying to go a little heavier. Because of the heavier weights, I will have to move the weight slower; but, I think that my weight will be more RM-appropriate (ie. my selected weight will be more accurate for the Rep Maximum of the given day). While I understand that when we move weight fast, we can activate large motor units (the motor units capable of the greatest hypertrophy), I also believe that when I go heavy, I have to really go heavy to really hit those large motor units.

The following is what I did today:

Wide Row (Seated Pulley)

  • 90 x 6
  • 100 x 5
  • 100 x 5
  • 100 x 5
  • 100 x 4

Notes: Felt good to go heavier today. Switched over to wide pulley row.

Dips

  • 100 x 6
  • 100 x 5
  • 100 x 5
  • 100 x 6
  • 100 x 4

Squat (Split DB)

  • 60 x 6
  • 70 x 5
  • 75 x 5
  • 75 x 4
  • 75 x 5

Notes: Grip giving out first!! Need straps next time.

I went heavier today on both wide cable pulley row and split squats. On split squats, I feel like I could have gone heavier, but my grip was giving out on the second leg. On dips, I didn't go heavier, but I did start off at the heavier weight rather than working up to 100. I really liked the way the heavier weight felt; and although it was heavier, I still tried to move it as fast as I was able to.

I'll see how this methodology workouts out for the rest of the week.




Reader Comments

Mar 31, 2009 at 7:10 PM // reply »
3 Comments

Just curious, what made you switch from the standing cable row to the seated row?


Apr 1, 2009 at 9:37 AM // reply »
10,640 Comments

@Matrix,

I couldn't keep my form standing. I couldn't provide enough resistance without leaning back too much. With the seated row (with wide grip), I have my feet to brace me in place. I think it allows me to concentrate on the rowing action and not on the standing aspect.

There are plenty of exercises where I can worry about full-chain pulling (ie. Dead lifts, cleans, etc.).


Apr 1, 2009 at 9:45 AM // reply »
3 Comments

Ah ok. I figured it was something like that.

I just started the program this week. The standing rows are very awkward. I thought about switching to the seated rows, but I like the concept of the standing row.

I did the 2nd workout of get ready today and those deadlifts are just brutal.


Apr 1, 2009 at 9:50 AM // reply »
10,640 Comments

@Matrix,

Yeah deadlifts are brutal, and deadlifts for higher reps (10-12) are especially difficult!


Post A Comment

Comment Etiquette: Please do not post spam. Please keep the comments on-topic. Please do not post unrelated questions or large chunks of code. And, above all, please be nice to each other - we're trying to have a good conversation here.

Please review the following issues:

Author Name:


Author Email:

Author Website:

Comment:

Supported HTML tags for formatting: <strong>bold</strong>   <em>italic</em>   <code>code</code>







  • Help Wanted - Find Your Next ColdFusion Job
InVision App - Prototyping Made Beautiful With Prototyping Tools Ben Nadel's Company - Epicenter Consulting Recent Blog Comments
Feb 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM
jQuery AJAX Strips Script Tags And Inserts Them After Parent-Most Elements
Update! Instead of $(eval(options.insertAfter)).after(data['insertData']); I now use: var ajaxNode = document.createElement('span'); var parent = $(eval(options.insertAfter))[0].parentNode; ... read »
Feb 10, 2012 at 6:18 PM
jQuery AJAX Strips Script Tags And Inserts Them After Parent-Most Elements
encountered this same, what I consider, jQuery bug last week. I'm building a site in which I load some content via AJAX. This content contains Linkedin share button placeholders which Linkedin API ne ... read »
Feb 10, 2012 at 11:30 AM
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) AJAX Requests Between jQuery And Node.js
After you understand the concepts here, this is an awesome cheatsheet for enabling CORS in just about anything http://enable-cors.org/ ... read »
JM
Feb 10, 2012 at 9:10 AM
My Safari Browser SQLite Database Hello World Example
@Amy, Here is a very good tutorial on how to use JOIN: http://www.sqltutorial.org/sqljoin-innerjoin.aspx ... read »
Feb 10, 2012 at 4:42 AM
Building A Twitter-Inspired RESTful API Architecture In ColdFusion
This is great, very useful Ben. I spotted a small typo in the api.cgm listing: <cfthrow type="Unauthroized" /> Cheers Stefan ... read »
Feb 9, 2012 at 10:35 PM
CFDirectory Filtering Uses Pipe Character For Multiple Filters (Thanks Steve Withington)
I was wondering if there would be a filter you could apply so that you got everything but what you included in the filter. As in show me all docs that are not a .pdf. ... read »
Feb 9, 2012 at 10:29 PM
Learning ColdFusion 9: Application-Specific Data Sources
@Ben, No offence, but if people were really wanting advanced features they would be using a platform like ASP.NET MVC. CFML is so structurally compromised as a tag-based scripting language that ... read »
Feb 9, 2012 at 10:03 PM
Subversion - Cleanup Failed To Process The Following Paths
@Leviaguirre, do you still have problems with this? ... read »