Ask Ben: Iterating Over An Array With jQuery

Posted November 17, 2008 at 8:33 AM

Tags: Javascript / DHTML, Ask Ben

Hi; I'm new to jquery. I have php array like:

$arr = array("one", "two", "three");

I would like to convert this array ( or copy its values) to jquery array and use .each. can someone show me this .

There are two different "each" methods in jQuery. One of them works on the jQuery stack (of DOM elements) and one of them is a utility object. They very might well work off of each other behind the scenes, but from an API view, these are two different methods with two different purposes. Luckily, the $.each() jQuery utility method does exactly what you need it to.

In the following demo, we are gonna take a Javascript array and, without any need to convert it to a jQuery array, loop over its values and add them to the document object model (DOM):

 Launch code in new window » Download code as text file »

  • <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
  • <html>
  • <head>
  • <title>Looping Over Arrays With jQuery</title>
  •  
  • <!-- Linked files. -->
  • <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery-1.2.6.min.js"></script>
  • <script type="text/javascript">
  •  
  • // Init the page once the DOM has loaded.
  • $( InitPage );
  •  
  •  
  • // Init the page.
  • function InitPage(){
  • // Get a refernce to the OL list element.
  • var jList = $( "#list" );
  •  
  • // Create our test array.
  • var arrValues = [ "one", "two", "three" ];
  •  
  • // Loop over each value in the array.
  • $.each(
  • arrValues,
  • function( intIndex, objValue ){
  •  
  • // Create a new LI HTML element out of the
  • // current value (in the iteration) and then
  • // add this value to the list.
  • jList.append(
  • $( "<li>" + objValue + "</li>" )
  • );
  • }
  • );
  •  
  • }
  •  
  • </script>
  • </head>
  • <body>
  •  
  • <h1>
  • Looping Over Arrays With jQuery
  • </h1>
  •  
  • <p>
  • Array Items:
  • </p>
  •  
  • <!---
  • This is the list into which we will be storing
  • the array items.
  • --->
  • <ol id="list">
  • <!--- List items will be added dynamically. --->
  • </ol>
  •  
  • </body>
  • </html>

Notice that the $.each() method takes two parameters - the current index of the array iteration and the value that was found in the array at that index. Once we have this value, we simply use jQuery to add it to the ordered list element on the page. Running the above code, our rendered page looks like this:

Array Items:

1. one
2. two
3. three

Now, looking at this code, it might seem that the $.each() method is actually more work than a standard FOR index-loop; and, at face value, it is. But, with this small bit of additional overhead, $.each() gives us a load of benefits. By passing each iteration value to a function, we create a new local scope in which to work, we create a Closure that has awesome potential, and we create a new variable for each loop value which removes many conflicts one can run into when binding event handlers.

Download Code Snippet ZIP File

Post Comment  |  Ask Ben  |  Permalink  |  Other Searches  |  Print Page


You Might Also Be Interested In:



Learning ColdFusion 9 - ColdFusion 9 tutorials, samples, examples, demos

Reader Comments

Nov 17, 2008 at 9:28 AM // reply »
207 Comments

Why is it that this line, $.each(, containts a pointer to your array? Ie, why isn't it: somevariable.each(


Nov 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM // reply »
6,516 Comments

@Ray,

I think that's how Prototype does it; but since jQuery doesn't alter the core javascript objects, there is no each() method in the javascript array class (at least not that I know of).


Nov 17, 2008 at 11:37 AM // reply »
207 Comments

I'm still confused though. How does the browser know that you are iterating over some variable? All you have is $. What if you had 2 arrays? Where is the 'link' - does that make sense? It would be like me doing

<cfoutput>#arrayLen()#</cfoutput>

withouth passing an array.


Nov 17, 2008 at 11:44 AM // reply »
6,516 Comments

@Ray,

I think I see what you're saying. The confusion, I think, comes from the fact that when you are dealing with the jQuery stack, you can call .each() directly on that stack:

jQueryVariable.each( fnCallback );

The $.each() utility method, on the other hand, does *not* know what variable it is acting on. That is why the $.each() method takes the target variable as its first argument:

$.each( AnyArrayVariable, fnCallback );

In either case, the "this" scope of the loop points to the current iteration value. In the former example, "this" points to the current DOM element; in the latter case, the "this" scope points to the array value (one, two, or three).

To be honest, I would not be surprised if the jQueryVariable.each() method actually turned around and called the utility method on its own internal stack.


Nov 17, 2008 at 4:14 PM // reply »
74 Comments

@Ben,

Exactly right. Also internally it $().each() does call $.each() to iterate the stack :)


Nov 17, 2008 at 5:24 PM // reply »
6,516 Comments

@Shuns,

Thanks for the clarification. I figured it would do as much just to cut down on code duplication.


Nov 17, 2008 at 9:55 PM // reply »
74 Comments

Yeah, thats sort of a key mantra with jQuery - as dry as possible


Nov 17, 2008 at 9:57 PM // reply »
6,516 Comments

@Shuns,

Word up, jQuery is rockin.


Nov 18, 2008 at 8:09 PM // reply »
40 Comments

@Ben,

Is this PHP user Ray? I want to know if he's doing PHP on the side instead of Coldfusion, lol!


Nov 19, 2008 at 8:11 AM // reply »
6,516 Comments

@Hatem,

Ha ha ha :) Php :)


Post Comment  |  Ask Ben

Recent Blog Comments
Nov 20, 2009 at 11:32 PM
Five Months Without Hungarian Notation And I'm Loving It
I've used headless camel case for years for not only ColdFusion variables, but also SQL tables and fields... pretty much everything involving code. I also subscribe to the "don't abbreviate and clea ... read »
Nov 20, 2009 at 11:00 PM
Five Months Without Hungarian Notation And I'm Loving It
@Marcel, Yeah, I always err on the side of longer but more readable variable names. As for the camel casing of CF methods and the headless camel casing of custom items, I get around this by always ... read »
Nov 20, 2009 at 10:56 PM
Five Months Without Hungarian Notation And I'm Loving It
I use the following and love it: my.namespace.MyComponents.functionMethodsOrUDF() CONSTANT_VALUES_OR_PROPERTIES One thing I always try is to CamelCaseBuiltInColdFusionFunctions() so others can tell ... read »
Nov 20, 2009 at 5:38 PM
Learning ColdFusion 8: CFImage Part I - Reading And Writing Images
Hi Ben, Great article. I've been looking around to see if ColdFusion image engine can programatically create the following "wrap around" effect: http://www.creativepro.com/article/photoshop-s-she ... read »
Nov 20, 2009 at 5:35 PM
Maintaining ColdFusion Sessions Across SMS Text Message Requests Without Cookies
@Dave: I talked to Gert he suggested: <cfhttp method="get" url="http://{some cf website}" result="stuff" addtoken="yes" /> Note the addition of cfhttp attribute addtoken. That should persist y ... read »
Nov 20, 2009 at 5:23 PM
Maintaining ColdFusion Sessions Across SMS Text Message Requests Without Cookies
@Todd, Ahh, gotcha, yeah that makes sense. ... read »
Nov 20, 2009 at 5:17 PM
Maintaining ColdFusion Sessions Across SMS Text Message Requests Without Cookies
Ben, sorry if I didn't make this clear. You can make it work like that if you want, just put <cfset session.foo = 1> (and <cfset application.foo = 1>) in your OnRequestStart() and it reve ... read »