Sex And The City Movie Staring Sarah Jessica Parker

Posted June 8, 2008 at 4:32 PM by Ben Nadel

Tags: Movies

Last night, I went to see the Sex And The City movie staring Sarah Jessica Parker (Carrie Bradshaw), Kim Cattrall (Samantha Jones), Kristin Davis (Charlotte York), and Cynthia Nixon (Miranda Hobbes). I am a big Sex and The City fan and I've enjoyed watching those four girls gallivant around New York City for the past 10 years. As a fan of the show, I have to say that I was excited but at the same time, very skeptical about the movie. In my experience, I have often found that the leap from the television screen to the silver screen is a very hard leap for a show to make; when you take a half hour or one hour show and wrap it up in a two hour movie, it tends to be either too thin, playing to fans and non-fans alike, or it comes off feeling too much like a longer-than-usual episode.


 
 
 

 
Sex And The City Movie Poster Starring Sarah Jessica Parker  
 
 
 

I am happy to say that, despite my skepticism, the Sexy And The City movie turned out to be really good. It had all the fun and laughs and sexiness from the show, but it really took the audience through a journey that only a movie can give you. I laughed, I choked up, I had a great time. One of the things that I have always loved about the show was that, despite its suggestive title, the subject matter was always much deeper than the carnal; it dealt with relationships and love; with heart throb and heart break; with all the curves that life can throw at you and the friendships that carry you through it all. The movie had all this and it had something more - closure. It definitely leaves you feeling satisfied with all the story lines. Not that it won't leave you wanting more - it will - but at least it will leave you feeling satisfied.


 
 
 

 
Sarah Jessica Parker (Carrie Bradshaw), Kim Cattrall (Samantha Jones), Kristin Davis (Charlotte York), and Cynthia Nixon (Miranda Hobbes) From Sex And The City Movie  
 
 
 

I know I don't need to say this, but anyone who is a fan of the show should definitely check out the movie. It's just a lot of fun.

On a personal, somewhat off-topic note, it was really nice to see Sarah Jessica Parker padding around in her traditional, full-bottomed under wear. I find so many woman today gravitate to these low-rise panties, thongs, and micro g-strings, that it's so refreshing to see a woman like Parker be able to take a pair of underwear, that I think is held in such a negative light in today's "hip" society, and make it look really hot. Sarah Jessica Parker's character has always dressed more conservitavely throughout the years, and I believe that she even had it in her contract that she would never have to do nude or sex scenes. And you know what, it's never taken away from the richness or attractiveness of a character. Just throwing that out there.


 
 
 

 
Sarah Jessica Parker In Sex And The City Movie  
 
 
 


Reader Comments

Jun 9, 2008 at 10:48 AM // reply »
13 Comments

Who are you, and what have you done with Ben? ;-)


Jun 9, 2008 at 10:53 AM // reply »
10,640 Comments

Ha ha, to be expected :)


Jun 9, 2008 at 4:07 PM // reply »
2 Comments

I did not see this movie and I'm not playing to watch it either. Why?
Because it got a 5.0/10 on imdb:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1000774/

Kind of surprises me that you a guy would enjoy this type of movie especially after looking at the rating in imdb ;O.


Jun 9, 2008 at 5:18 PM // reply »
15 Comments

Ben-

I think that a man that can admit enjoying a girl flick is EXTREMELY SEXY! to bad not enough men are men enough to admit, that they do enjoy these types of movies. Too bad cause chicks totally dig that!


Jun 9, 2008 at 5:39 PM // reply »
10,640 Comments

@Naga,

I am surprised that it is getting only a 5/10 on the IMDB. Although, when you think about the country, I guess its not that surprising. Afterall, the country is fairly conservative, especially when you leave the coasts and Sex and the City is a relatively risqué show. I'm sure that the majority of people around don't want to even think what these girls are talking about.

I can tell you that in NYC, which is an extremely forward thinking area, it got a clapping ovation in my showing as well as other showings (as I am told by friends of mine).

@Jazzy,

Now that's what I'm talkin' bout :)


Jun 18, 2008 at 7:33 PM // reply »
2 Comments

Sex and the City seems to have a polarizing effect on both men and women... people either love the movie or they hate it


Joe
Oct 8, 2008 at 4:45 AM // reply »
3 Comments

My wife and I both absolutely hated this movie. We then realized we were used to the more watchable "PG" version that appears on TBS or whatever. Oddly enough we never watched it until it hit syndication.

It did feel like a 2-hour episode, which is fine. If it tried to be more it would have been even worse. However, I'm still not sure I understand the point of introducing a new character in Jennifer Hudson felt forced and just didn't fit at all to me.


Oct 8, 2008 at 8:28 AM // reply »
10,640 Comments

@Joe,

While I liked the movie, I agree with the Jennifer Hudson comment. Adding a new character for the movie did feel odd.


Oct 25, 2011 at 8:33 AM // reply »
2 Comments

My wife recently watched this on DVD and she loved it! I think I might watch this too after reading your review. Thanks!


Post A Comment

Comment Etiquette: Please do not post spam. Please keep the comments on-topic. Please do not post unrelated questions or large chunks of code. And, above all, please be nice to each other - we're trying to have a good conversation here.

Please review the following issues:

Author Name:


Author Email:

Author Website:

Comment:

Supported HTML tags for formatting: <strong>bold</strong>   <em>italic</em>   <code>code</code>







  • Help Wanted - Find Your Next ColdFusion Job
InVision App - Prototyping Made Beautiful With Prototyping Tools Ben Nadel's Company - Epicenter Consulting Recent Blog Comments
Feb 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM
jQuery AJAX Strips Script Tags And Inserts Them After Parent-Most Elements
Update! Instead of $(eval(options.insertAfter)).after(data['insertData']); I now use: var ajaxNode = document.createElement('span'); var parent = $(eval(options.insertAfter))[0].parentNode; ... read »
Feb 10, 2012 at 6:18 PM
jQuery AJAX Strips Script Tags And Inserts Them After Parent-Most Elements
encountered this same, what I consider, jQuery bug last week. I'm building a site in which I load some content via AJAX. This content contains Linkedin share button placeholders which Linkedin API ne ... read »
Feb 10, 2012 at 11:30 AM
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) AJAX Requests Between jQuery And Node.js
After you understand the concepts here, this is an awesome cheatsheet for enabling CORS in just about anything http://enable-cors.org/ ... read »
JM
Feb 10, 2012 at 9:10 AM
My Safari Browser SQLite Database Hello World Example
@Amy, Here is a very good tutorial on how to use JOIN: http://www.sqltutorial.org/sqljoin-innerjoin.aspx ... read »
Feb 10, 2012 at 4:42 AM
Building A Twitter-Inspired RESTful API Architecture In ColdFusion
This is great, very useful Ben. I spotted a small typo in the api.cgm listing: <cfthrow type="Unauthroized" /> Cheers Stefan ... read »
Feb 9, 2012 at 10:35 PM
CFDirectory Filtering Uses Pipe Character For Multiple Filters (Thanks Steve Withington)
I was wondering if there would be a filter you could apply so that you got everything but what you included in the filter. As in show me all docs that are not a .pdf. ... read »
Feb 9, 2012 at 10:29 PM
Learning ColdFusion 9: Application-Specific Data Sources
@Ben, No offence, but if people were really wanting advanced features they would be using a platform like ASP.NET MVC. CFML is so structurally compromised as a tag-based scripting language that ... read »
Feb 9, 2012 at 10:03 PM
Subversion - Cleanup Failed To Process The Following Paths
@Leviaguirre, do you still have problems with this? ... read »