Project HUGE: 100 Reps Of Leg Press

Posted December 30, 2007 at 3:02 PM by Ben Nadel

Tags: Health / Fitness, Project HUGE

Friday night, I went to the gym with my lifting partner to hit up a work out. It ended up that he worked out and I kind of just went through the motions. After having had my teeth cleaned earlier in the day (which is super stressful for me), I had tension pain in my neck and traps and my gums felt all irritated. As such, I couldn't seem to focus or perform any kind of movement that didn't somehow hurt my neck. Basically, I was worthless both to myself and to my partner.

Saturday, I spent most of the day in the office working on a double secret project. At about 4PM, I was so overcome with the shame of having not stepped up to the previous day's workout, that I realized that even though it was an "off" day, I needed run over to the gym and do something manly. I decided that I would try something that I had never tried before: the 100 Rep rep scheme.

The 100 Rep rep scheme consists of selecting a weight on a given exercise and then performing 100 reps with that weight. You don't need to do this all in one set, obviously, you just need to get it done. Maybe it takes 4 sets, maybe it takes 20 sets - it doesn't matter; the only thing that matters it that you walk away with 100 reps. And, since I felt like I hadn't had a good leg workout in a while, I thought I would try this on Leg Press (somehow, I felt trying this new technique on squats would only lead to injury).

So, I got on the leg press and did a few warm-up sets until I was at a weight that I thought would be challenging - 12 plates (6 plates per side). I wasn't exactly sure how to perform each set - do I go to failure on each set? Do I go no higher than a given rep count? While these questions remain unanswered, it really didn't matter; in the end, I didn't have much of a choice.

It took me 10 beefy, blood-pumping sets to get to 100 reps:

  • Set 1: 12 reps (12 total)
  • Set 2: 13 reps (25 total)
  • Set 3: 10 reps (35 total)
  • Set 4: 7 reps (42 total)
  • Set 5: 10 reps (52 total)
  • Set 6: 10 reps (62 total)
  • Set 7: 10 reps (72 total)
  • Set 8: 8 reps (80 total)
  • Set 9: 12 reps (92 total)
  • Set 10: 8 reps (100 total)

It was a pretty intense exercise! Lots of talking to myself, trying to psych myself up, lots of pacing back and forth, looking up and saying things like "Oh I guarantee!" and "Light weight baby!" I was surprised that I was able to keep up the 7-10 rep range on each set. That might just mean the sled wasn't heavy enough. Maybe next time, I'll try 7 plates per side, but this isn't something that I am going to be doing a lot. This is just for shock value to my system - get it out of the rut and force some sort of adaptative response.

Today, my quads, glutes, and even my calves are feeling very tight and sore. I would have liked to have included more hamstring, but the leg press is a very quad-dominant exercise. Maybe next time I try this rep scheme, I will rock 100 reps of deadlifts, a very hip-dominant exercise. Until then, let's sit back and enjoy this YouTube.com vide of big Ronnie Coleman (former Mr. Olympia) doing 8 reps of leg press with 2,300 lbs:


 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 


Reader Comments

Dec 30, 2007 at 3:29 PM // reply »
20 Comments

Wow!!!! And of course, I feel rather silly staying home from the gym today to meet my deadline. Back in there tomorrow!


Dec 31, 2007 at 7:45 AM // reply »
11,243 Comments

@Christian,

Taking some time off is always a good thing - definitely something that is underrated. I took three days off cause of the Christmas time, and when I came back to the gym, I just felt refreshed and powerful. If anything, I think I should take more time off than I do; I don't want to wear down.


Dec 31, 2007 at 7:58 AM // reply »
20 Comments

I hadn't considered the benefits of taking a little break here and there. This holiday season has proven difficult to keep consistent. We have to travel a lot and the sleep schedule gets thrown off. Oh well, at least I'm off tomorrow and the gym is open. Yippie!!!


Dec 31, 2007 at 8:01 AM // reply »
11,243 Comments

@Christian,

I like it! Start off '08 powerful :)


Aug 21, 2009 at 2:11 AM // reply »
1 Comments

Wow, looks powerful.


Post A Comment

Comment Etiquette: Please do not post spam. Please keep the comments on-topic. Please do not post unrelated questions or large chunks of code. And, above all, please be nice to each other - we're trying to have a good conversation here.

Please review the following issues:

Author Name:


Author Email:

Author Website:

Comment:

Supported HTML tags for formatting: <strong>bold</strong>   <em>italic</em>   <code>code</code>







  • Help Wanted - Find Your Next ColdFusion Job
Ben Nadel's Company - Epicenter Consulting Recent Blog Comments
May 22, 2013 at 12:44 PM
Ask Ben: Query Loop Inside CFScript Tags
In cf10, if you call a function that has: local.result = {}; local.result.msg = ""; local.svc = new query(); local.svc.setSQL("SELECT * FROM..."); local.obj = local.svc.exe ... read »
May 22, 2013 at 12:29 PM
Strange Interaction Between DeserializeJson(), ArrayContains(), And Database Values In ColdFusion
@Ben: What version of Java are you using? Also, did you test users.id to see what Java reports as the data type? I wonder if it's not a Java primitive data type, but getting returned as something ... read »
May 22, 2013 at 11:47 AM
Strange Interaction Between DeserializeJson(), ArrayContains(), And Database Values In ColdFusion
@Dana, Awesome - so it looks like this bug was fixed in ColdFusion 10. Thanks so much for double-checking that. ... read »
May 22, 2013 at 11:37 AM
Strange Interaction Between DeserializeJson(), ArrayContains(), And Database Values In ColdFusion
When I c&p and run on cf10, I get: Selected User IDs: 1,4 User 1 selected: YES - YES User 2 selected: NO - NO User 3 selected: NO - NO User 4 selected: YES - YES User 5 selected: NO - ... read »
May 22, 2013 at 11:27 AM
Strange Interaction Between DeserializeJson(), ArrayContains(), And Database Values In ColdFusion
@Tom, Good thought, but no dice. Both of these still exhibit the same behavior: users.id[ users.currentRow ] users[ "id" ][ users.currentRow ] It's just something whacky happening with ... read »
May 22, 2013 at 11:07 AM
Strange Interaction Between DeserializeJson(), ArrayContains(), And Database Values In ColdFusion
Could your problem be that "users.id" is actually an ARRAY, not a single value? Perhaps try it again with "users.id[1]" (I only have CF8 here at work). ... read »
May 22, 2013 at 7:52 AM
Nested Views, Routing, And Deep Linking With AngularJS
Hi, Just a quick thank you. As it happens, for my own purposes, the pending ui-router work being done in native angular is likely the one I'll adopt, but your exploration, code and documentation of ... read »
May 22, 2013 at 4:43 AM
How Do You Use The ColdFusion CFParam Tag?
'<cfparam>' or 'isDefined()and <cfset>' performs the same task.Is there any difference? ... read »
InVision App - Prototyping Made Beautiful With Prototyping Tools