Cool jQuery Predicate Selectors

Posted October 19, 2007 at 5:21 PM

Tags: Javascript / DHTML

I was reading up on jQuery last night and came across some cool jQuery predicate filtering in the selector statements. We have all seen the predicate for full attribute value matches:

 Launch code in new window » Download code as text file »

  • a[ @rel = 'nofollow' ]

This would select all the links in the document object model that have a REL attribute value of "nofollow". In addition to the "=" comparison operator, jQuery provides some additional regular-expression-esque comparison operators.

Start With: ^=

The ^= operator will filter elements whose attribute starts with the given value.

Ends With: $=

The $= operator will filter elements whose attribute ends with the given value.

Contains: *=

The *= operator will filter elements whose attribute contains the given value.

To test this, I whipped up a little demo page. On this demo page we have a number of list items, each of which have an ID that starts with "list" and ends with the one-based index of the list item. Then, we use the jQuery selectors from above to output the text of the matched elements:

 Launch code in new window » Download code as text file »

  • <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
  • <html>
  • <head>
  • <title>jQuery Attribute Predicate Demo</title>
  • <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery.pack.js"></script>
  • </head>
  • <body>
  •  
  • <h1>
  • jQuery Attribute Predicate Demo
  • </h1>
  •  
  • <ul>
  • <li id="list1">One</li>
  • <li id="list2">Two</li>
  • <li id="list3">Three</li>
  • </ul>
  •  
  •  
  • <!---
  • Below are the test that we will run against
  • the unordered list above.
  • --->
  •  
  •  
  • <h2>
  • Tests / Results
  • </h2>
  •  
  • <h3>
  • Full Match: "li[ @id = 'list1' ]"
  • </h3>
  •  
  • <p>
  • <script type="text/javascript">
  • document.write(
  • $( "li[ @id = 'list1' ]" ).text()
  • );
  • </script>
  • </p>
  •  
  •  
  • <h3>
  • Start With Match: "li[ @id ^= 'list' ]"
  • </h3>
  •  
  • <p>
  • <script type="text/javascript">
  • document.write(
  • $( "li[ @id ^= 'list' ]" ).text()
  • );
  • </script>
  • </p>
  •  
  •  
  • <h3>
  • Ends With Match: "li[ @id $= '3' ]"
  • </h3>
  •  
  • <p>
  • <script type="text/javascript">
  • document.write(
  • $( "li[ @id $= '3' ]" ).text()
  • );
  • </script>
  • </p>
  •  
  •  
  • <h3>
  • Contains Match: "li[ @id *= 'st' ]"
  • </h3>
  •  
  • <p>
  • <script type="text/javascript">
  • document.write(
  • $( "li[ @id *= 'st' ]" ).text()
  • );
  • </script>
  • </p>
  •  
  • </body>
  • </html>

Running the above page, we get the following output:

Full Match: "li[ @id = 'list1' ]"

One

Start With Match: "li[ @id ^= 'list' ]"

OneTwoThree

Ends With Match: "li[ @id $= '3' ]"

Three

Contains Match: "li[ @id *= 'st' ]"

OneTwoThree

The more I read up on jQuery, the more I realize how sweet-ass it is. jQuery is the "Easy" button of the user interface world.


 
 
 

 
jQuery: The Easy Button For User Interface Development  
 
 
 

Download Code Snippet ZIP File

Post Comment  |  Ask Ben  |  Permalink  |  Print Page



Learning ColdFusion 9 - ColdFusion 9 tutorials, samples, examples, demos

Reader Comments

Oct 20, 2007 at 12:08 PM // reply »
1 Comments

>> jQuery is the "Easy" button of the user interface world.

Exactly!

Thanks for this nice explanation of the various specific selectors.


cypher
Mar 16, 2009 at 9:57 AM // reply »
1 Comments

Quite interesting.
Note however that the code above will not work with jQuery v 1.3 and above.

You simply need to remove the "@".

More info at :
http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.3#Upgrading


Mar 16, 2009 at 10:03 AM // reply »
5,406 Comments

@Cypher,

That is correct. This XPath-like attribute selection was used, then deprecated, and now, in the latest releases, completely removed.


Vx
Apr 1, 2009 at 12:38 AM // reply »
4 Comments

so how do you do this in the new jQuery?


Vx
Apr 1, 2009 at 12:39 AM // reply »
4 Comments

never mind... see the comment by Ben, i can't find the api reference though? any link for that?


Apr 1, 2009 at 9:30 AM // reply »
5,406 Comments

@Vx,

Check out http://docs.jquery.com.


Vx
Apr 2, 2009 at 1:48 AM // reply »
4 Comments

:) I've been using that and a search through there doesn't show any results for Predicates, or *=
I haven't found it in the docs, could you?


Apr 2, 2009 at 8:31 AM // reply »
5,406 Comments

@Vx,

Check out Attribute Filters in the Selectors section:

http://docs.jquery.com/Selectors

Basically, in newer version of jQuery, you just have to remove teh @ sign.


Vx
Apr 3, 2009 at 12:14 AM // reply »
4 Comments

Ahh I see it now... Thanks :)
I've been through the selectors page a dozen times, i wonder how i missed it! hehe.
$("input[id*='wait'][hidden]").val() would work now...
Thanks


Apr 3, 2009 at 8:07 AM // reply »
5,406 Comments

@Vx,

No problem man, glad you got it working.


Post Comment  |  Ask Ben

Recent Blog Comments
Justice
Jul 3, 2009 at 11:10 PM
Create A Running Average Without Storing Individual Values
@Ben, I think you're going about this the wrong way. You're trying to use complicated techniques when there is a simple and beautiful technique readily available (a la Gary Funk's comment). Instead ... read »
Bob
Jul 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM
Project HUGE: Huge In A Hurry - Get Big - Phase 3 / Week 1
a good technical explanation http://crossfitphoenix.typepad.com/crossfit_phoenix_forging_/the-overhead-squat.html ... read »
Jul 3, 2009 at 9:03 PM
Create A Running Average Without Storing Individual Values
If I wanted to do this and only carry two numbers, I'd keep track of the sum and N. Then you are pretty much accurate all the time. average = (sum + new_number) / (N + 1) But all this was in a for ... read »
Roland Collins
Jul 3, 2009 at 8:58 PM
Create A Running Average Without Storing Individual Values
@Martin - not just floating point though. Depending on what langauge you're working in, decimals can cause just as many headaches if they're not precise enough. But again, for most applications, th ... read »
Isnogood
Jul 3, 2009 at 7:16 PM
Project HUGE: Huge In A Hurry - Get Big - Phase 3 / Week 1
Watch this http://www.nsca-lift.org/videos/default.shtml ... read »
Aaron
Jul 3, 2009 at 7:13 PM
Project HUGE: Get Big, Phase One (Chat Waterbury - Huge In A Hurry)
I've just finished the 3rd week of phase 3, and have to agree that the overhead squats are hard. I think this is most due to the wide grip on which places more pressure on your upper back. Only this ... read »
Isnogood
Jul 3, 2009 at 7:11 PM
Project HUGE: Huge In A Hurry - Get Big - Phase 3 / Week 1
Very good, there were some near perfect reps, and there were some dodgy ones, but you're getting there your body position is good. Work on your depth and do not let the bar move forward or backward, ... read »
Martin Mädler
Jul 3, 2009 at 6:48 PM
Create A Running Average Without Storing Individual Values
Nice dodge! I dig the idea to force out the last bit of performance out of a chunk of code, even though it's such a minor thing. Heard of this kinda approach in connection with "running sums". @Rola ... read »