XMLHttpRequest Object Has An Abort() Method

Posted October 19, 2007 at 4:21 PM

Tags: Javascript / DHTML

I made an update to the my Kinky File Explorer this morning to fix the bug involving the asynchronous behavior of the AJAX file loading. The problem was that if you clicked around the file tree fast, the code that you ended up with on the right hand side might not reflect the file tree selection. This was due to the fact that the order of AJAX callback handler executions was not tied directly to the order of the file tree selections (hence the asynchronous nature).

Last night, when reading up on jQuery, I actually happened upon the key to a solution: the XMLHttpRequest .abort() method. I have not done a ton with AJAX so this method was unknown to me, but basically what it does is cancel the currently executing AJAX request tied to the given XMLHttpRequest Object and ensures that the call back handler does not get executed (assuming it has not returned yet).

So now, as part of my Kinky File Explorer data file loading, I have a global variable that keeps track of the currently executing file request. If a new file request has been launched before the previous one has finished executing, the Javascript will .abort() the previous request and store the new request into the global variable. This way, I only ever have one AJAX request taking place at a time which is perfect because I only ever want the most recent file tree selection to be loaded into the "code" content area.

Here is what that part of the now looks like:

 Launch code in new window » Download code as text file »

  • // This will load the given file into the PRE element.
  • function ShowFile( strPath ){
  •  
  • // Check to see if there is an AJAX request already in
  • // progress that needs to be stopped.
  • if (objHttpFileDataRequest){
  •  
  • // Abort the AJAX request.
  • objHttpFileDataRequest.abort();
  •  
  • }
  •  
  • // Use AJAX to get the text of the file and store the
  • // new AJAX request object into the global variable.
  • objHttpFileDataRequest = $.get(
  • "index.cfm",
  • {
  • getdata: 1,
  • file: encodeURI( strPath )
  • },
  • function( strFileData ){
  • $( "pre#fileoutput" ).text( strFileData );
  • }
  • );
  •  
  • }
  •  
  •  
  • // Store a global value to the HTTP request object that is
  • // going to be used in our AJAX file data calls. In order
  • // to make sure that calls are not jumbled, we want to
  • // serialize our requests. Meaning, if one request goes out,
  • // it should abort any previously running request.
  • var objHttpFileDataRequest = null;

Now, granted, I probably don't need to call .abort() on AJAX requests that have already finished executing, but for simplicity's sake, I am calling .abort() if the XMLHttpRequest object exists, regardless. jQuery makes this code wicked simple and I am seeing now that jQuery provides some additional AJAX utility methods that will make these kinds of situations even easier to deal with (ex. $.ajaxStart(), $.ajaxStop()).

Download Code Snippet ZIP File

Post Comment  |  Ask Ben  |  Permalink  |  Other Searches  |  Print Page



Learning ColdFusion 9 - ColdFusion 9 tutorials, samples, examples, demos

Reader Comments

Oct 19, 2007 at 5:59 PM // reply »
153 Comments

Given that you appear to be using GET requests (I know nothing of jQuery, but I assume $.get means GET), and that you don't appear to be doing any cache-busting, may I suggest something else?

Instead of storing whatever the current one is, and throwing away anything else, why not just check the result against the current one, and only apply the change if it is the right one? That is:

/* Outside the function */
var strCurrentFetchingFile = '';
/* Later, inside the function */
strCurrentFetchingFile = strPath;
$.get("index.cfm",{getdata: 1,file: encodeURI(strPath)},
function(strFileData) {
if(strPath == strCurrentFetchingFile) {
$("pre#fileoutput").text(strFileData);
strCurrentFetchingFile = null;
}
}
);

Using abort() seems a bit heavy-handed to me. The call has already been made, and less you have a really smart server script that can detect dropped connections, the script is going to process to completion anyway. But, if you abort, then likely the browser will just have to make that same call later again, possibly fetching much of the same content. Instead, let the browser complete the call and put it in its cache. Just don't act on it if it isn't the data you want to see.

Of course, if you later decide to add expiry to the content and want to same some bandwidth, the abort() option may be the best bet.


Oct 19, 2007 at 6:13 PM // reply »
6,371 Comments

@Rick,

That's a pretty clever idea. I didn't think of any caching issues / benefits, but that's not a bad tip at all :) Thanks a lot.


RubyMuse
Jul 6, 2008 at 4:34 PM // reply »
1 Comments

I've been using the jQuery higher level .load(url) method rather than .get. I'm wondering if there's still a way to get access to the XMLHttpRequest object in order to abort the request, or whether I have to abandon the load method to do that. Thanks!


Jul 7, 2008 at 8:41 AM // reply »
6,371 Comments

@Ruby,

It looks like the request object gets passed back through to the call back, but by then, I guess it is too late to abort a request.


Post Comment  |  Ask Ben

Recent Blog Comments
Nov 7, 2009 at 5:53 PM
Ask Ben: Javascript String Replace Method
You can find here an advanced function that prepared with javascript replace function. This can make the first letters of words, sentences, lines and whatever you define automatically: http://www.m ... read »
Andrew Neely
Nov 7, 2009 at 4:56 PM
A Moment That Touched Me - The Fountainhead
Ben, Glad you enjoyed the podcast. Yeah, the Tank Riot guys can get really chatty during the episodes, but that's part of the charm of it for me. They've covered everything from Nichola Tesla to Cha ... read »
Nov 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM
Building A Fixed-Position Bottom Menu Bar (ala FaceBook)
Is it possible to make some more MenĂ¼`s ? ... read »
Jill
Nov 7, 2009 at 11:40 AM
How To Unformat Your Code (Like A Pro)
Derek, I think you might be right - sweet! Thanks for the link :) ... read »
Nov 7, 2009 at 11:25 AM
How To Unformat Your Code (Like A Pro)
I think it would be way easier to just use this http://www.logichammer.com/html-formatter/ He just released v3 and it rocks. ... read »
Jill
Nov 7, 2009 at 7:58 AM
How To Unformat Your Code (Like A Pro)
LMAO - this was pretty funny! I have to admit - I also love to reformat code so I can read it. My boss used to tell me to leave my OCD at home. Now I don't feel so bad after reading everyone else' ... read »
Nov 6, 2009 at 10:10 PM
How To Unformat Your Code (Like A Pro)
The timing of this post is just uncanny. I spent the last 15-20 minutes manually un-formatting my "Ben Nadel" style code within a CFC of mine. I was really digging the readability a few weeks ago, bu ... read »
Roe
Nov 6, 2009 at 5:11 PM
Passing Arrays By Reference In ColdFusion - SWEEET!
ArraySort also reorders the results of these java obj's ... read »